Spacetime curvature around Gaussian wave packets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_packet#/media/File:Wavepacket-a2k4-en.gif
From quantum mechanics we know how to describe, statistically, an unbound particle floating in space. Treat it as a dispersing, normalizable, Gaussian wave packet. We know how the wave packet evolves, and can give "what would we measure" descriptions of it's properties by sandwiching the right operator representing some/any physical quantity.
Question 1: why can't we just work with the expectation values of properties of a massive spread-out wave function ( < x >, < p > ), write up some statistical, or averaged version of a stress-energy-momentum tensor, plug it into the Einstein field equations, tidy out issues, and voila: wave-function sourced probabilistic description of the spacetime metric? I'm certain there's some problems with this "program", but what?
Question 2: put two apples into space with a zero relative velocity. Due to gravity, they will eventually move towards each other. Now lets say it's not two apples, but two Gaussian wave packets of neutral particles. What has to be plugged into this two-particle $\Psi$ that would evolve it in a way where the two maxima of the probability density would move closer to each other over time at the right rate?
Especially Q2 seems to be such a simple setup that smart people must have written
something up that works, at least approximately.
 A: Regarding the first part of the question, the problem with this approach is that you are combining general relativity with wave packets, which evolve according to Schrodinger equation, and so do not behave well under Lorentz transformations. You would get some non-Lorentz-covariant result.
Before you can combine quantum particles and general relativity, you need to find a special relativistic description of quantum particles. In doing so, you will find that to avoid paradoxes and inconsistencies it is necessary to abandon the concept of single particle wavefunction and wave packet. A special relativistic description of quantum mechanics requires fileds and it is called quantum field theory.
In order to fit gravity in a quantum field theory (an make it interact with other fields) you need to make it a quantum field. And that is the challenge we haven't been able to overcome.
Regarding the second part of the question, if we assume Newtonian gravity, and that the two particles are neutral and without spin, then this is mathematically equivalent to the problem of the hydrogen atom.
There are two particles that attract each other with an inverse square law, just like a proton and an electron. You can just write down the hamiltonian and solve it numerically with standard tools of quantum mechanics.
