0
$\begingroup$

What are useful parametrizations of Minkowski 4-vectors for spherically symmetric problems?

I can only think of one, namely (for space-like intervals) $$ x^\mu = \rho(\cosh \alpha, \sinh \alpha \sin \theta \cos \phi, \sinh \alpha \sin \theta \sin \phi, \sinh \alpha \cos \theta) $$ Here $\rho = \pm \sqrt{x^\mu x_\mu}$ and $R=\rho \, \sinh \alpha$ is the radial distance which should be positive.

However, I'm not sure about the ranges for $\rho$ and $\alpha$. Should it be $(-\infty, \infty)$ or are we overcounting? Are there any other useful ways to parametrize 4-vectors?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Since $(x^0)^2>\sum_i(x^i)^2$, surely this is time-like. $\endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Aug 20, 2021 at 16:20

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Since $x^0\ne0$, $\rho$ matches its sign, so can be any nonzero real. To avoid overcounting, demand $\alpha\ge0$, so $\rho^{-1}x^i\operatorname{csch}\alpha$ is a unit vector in $\Bbb R^3$, each such vector counted once on the surface of fixed $\rho,\,\alpha$. (The case $\alpha=0$ yields one point per $\rho$, so at that point take e.g. $\theta=\phi=0$.)

As for other parameterizations, there's one of those for every general coordinate transformation; all you've done in particular is switched from the pedagogical starting point of Cartesian coordinates to a hyperboloid polar aalternative.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.