According to the book "Supergravity" written by Freedman & van Proeyen in 5D for the existence of Majorana spinors it is necessary to introduce so called sympletic ones which requires the introduction a second spinor $\chi^2 $ which is related to the first one $\chi^1$ by (Eq. (3.86)):
$$\chi^i = \epsilon^{ij} B^{-1} (\chi^j)* \tag{1} $$
where $\epsilon^{ij}$ is the antisymmetrical symplectic matrix and $B=it_0 C\gamma^0$ is a matrix which in general $D$ fulfills $B^{\ast} B =-t_1$.
In parenthesis: "normally" one would have for a Majorana spinor: $\psi^\ast = B\psi$ (Eq.3.80 of Supergravity).
$C$ is charge conjugation matrix and $\gamma^0$ the "first" generator of the Clifford algebra in Minkowski-space.
Furthermore there are coefficients $t_r=\pm 1$ which are defined by the symmetry properties of charge conjugation matrix $C$ when it (anti)-commutes with different elements of the Clifford algebra. They are defined by the following relation for any arbitrary dimension at least $D<12$: $$(C\Gamma^{(r))})^T = -t_r C \Gamma^{(r)}$$
where $\Gamma^{(r)}$ is a matrix of the set $\{\Gamma^A =\mathbb{1}, \gamma^\mu, \gamma^{\mu_1,\mu_2},\ldots, \gamma^{\mu_1,\mu_2,\ldots, \mu_D\}}$ of rank $r$.
Actually these coefficients $t_r$ take on different values depending on the dimension of space. In the book "Supergravity" these coefficients are documented in table 3.1 of which I will only extract the values for $D=5$: $t_0=1\quad t_1=1$. So in 5 dimensions it is $B^{\ast} B =-1$
Then I guess, a transformation of the type (1) would look like this:
$$\left(\begin{array}{c} \chi^1 \\ \chi^2\end{array}\right) \rightarrow \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & B^{-1}\\ -B^{-1} & 0 \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c} (\chi^1)^\ast \\ (\chi^2)^\ast \end{array}\right)$$
whereas a concatentation of two such transformations
$$\left(\begin{array}{c} \chi^1 \\ \chi^2\end{array}\right) \rightarrow \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & B^{-1}\\ -B^{-1} & 0 \end{array}\right) \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & (B^{-1})^\ast \\ -(B^{-1})^\ast & 0 \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c} (\chi^1)^{\ast\ast} \\ (\chi^2)^{\ast\ast} \end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c} \chi^1 \\ \chi^2 \end{array}\right)$$
would restore the spinor we started from since in 5D necessarily $B$ fulfills $B^\ast B =-1$.
The concept of symplectic Majorana spinor is confusing for me since by the introduction of a second spinor in order to achieve the Majorana compatibility condition: $B^\ast B =-t_1$ the full spinor $(\chi^1, \chi^2)^T$ (this is apparently what is called symplectic Majorana spinor) now contains 8 components whereas the Clifford Algebra in 5D still operates with $4\times 4$ matrices $\gamma^0, \gamma^1, \gamma^2, \gamma^3,\gamma^5$.
How does this fit together ? Is the form I used for the symplectic Majorana condition correct ?
What is also disturbing is the proliferation of components only 1 dimension more than 4D.