In a physics book I came across the following solution to a differential equation modeling forced, damped, oscillating motion: $$x(t)=A\cos(\omega t+\phi)$$ where $$A=\frac{F_0}{\sqrt{m^2\left(\omega^2-\omega_0^2\right)^2+b^2\omega^2}}$$ The differential equation which prompted this solution is $$-kx-b\dot{x}+F_0\sin(\omega t)=m\ddot{x}$$

This doesn't feel quite intuitively right, however. When the angular frequency $\omega$ of the thing which is causing the forced oscillating is equal to the natural angular frequency $\omega_0$ of the system it is causing an oscillation in, this seems to work intuitively. But when this isn't the case, it seems like $x(t)$ cannot be modeled as a single trig function, but rather a combination of multiple.

For example, in this video at 1:26, the frequency $\omega$ of the vibration generator is set to 2Hz, which is different than the natural frequency $\omega_0$ of the system (this turns out to be $\approx3.33$Hz) and the motion of the mass does not appear to resemble a single trig function, but rather multiple.

Here is my best attempt to graph the seeming motion at 1:26:


My question: Is the formula incorrect/a simplified version? If so, what is the correct one? If not, where am I going wrong here?


2 Answers 2


The solution of a forced and damped harmonic oscillator $$m\ddot{x}=-kx - b\dot{x} +F_0 \cos\omega_{\text{d}} t$$ is actually the sum of steady-state part $x_{\text{s}}$ and a transient part $x_{\text{t}}$ $$x = x_{\text{s}} + x_{\text{t}}$$ where $$x_{\text{s}} \sim A\cos(\omega t+\phi) \\ x_{\text{t}} \sim A' e^{-\gamma t} \sin (\omega' t+\phi')$$

The transient part depends on the initial conditions and both parts are present at the start. As time goes on, the transient part decays exponentially, leaving only the steady-state solution, which is the one you quoted. The full equations can be found here. Therefore, at the beginning, the motion will not be a single pure trig function but rather a sum of two trig functions.


When watching the video (beginning at around 0:35) carefully, we can see that the driving element (at the bottom of the device) does not move in a purely sine oscillation. It moves more like this:

enter image description here

The driving movement is still a periodic, but not a sine-like function.

You can decompose this oscillation (like every periodic motion) into a Fourier series of several pure sine oscillations.

In this case the Fourier decomposition is roughly like this: $$F(t)= F_0( \sin(\omega t) + 0.33\sin(3\omega t) + 0.2\sin(5\omega t) + ...)$$

You see, the movement contains not only the base frequency $\omega$, but also higher frequencies (which are multiples of the base frequency).

To convince you of the validity of the Fourier decomposition, here is a plot of $F(t)$ with only the first 3 components of the series being considered. When considering even more higher frequency components, then the series would approximate the function from the first image even better.

enter image description here
(image created by FooPlot)

Then the solution of the differential equation $$-kx-b\dot{x}+F(t)=m\ddot{x}$$

will be $$\begin{align} x(t) &= A(\omega)\cos(\omega t+\phi(\omega)) \\ &+ 0.33 A(3\omega)\cos(3\omega t+\phi(3\omega)) \\ &+ 0.2 A(5\omega)\cos(5\omega t+\phi(5\omega)) \\ &+ ... \end{align}$$

where $A(\omega)$ is still the expression as given in your question and $\phi(\omega)$ is another expression which can also be calculated from the differential equation. It is no surprise, that the response $x(t)$ contains not only the base frequency $\omega$, but also the higher frequencies. Especially, when one of these higher frequencies ($n\omega$) happens to be near to the resonance frequency ($\omega_0$), then the component with $A(n\omega)$ will be quite large. This is exactly what you could observe in the video.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.