2
$\begingroup$

I know that an einstein rosen bridge is derived by a coordinate transformation on the schwarzschild metric, but I can't find much on it online, could someone please show how to change the metric into a "wormhole" one and explain it a bit?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

The usual Schwarzchild metric is given by

$$ ds^{2}=(1-2 M / r) d t^{2}-\frac{d r^{2}}{1-2 M / r}-r^{2} d \Omega^{2}. $$ We can make a coordinate transformation of the form $u^2 = r - 2M$.

This gives $1-2M/r = \frac{u^2}{u^2 + 2M}$ and $dr = 2u du$ such that the line element becomes

$$ ds^{2}=\frac{u^2}{u^2 + 2M} d t^{2}-4(u^2 + 2M)du^2-(u^2 + 2M)^2 d \Omega^{2}. $$ This is the line element for the Einstein-Rosen bridge. This coordinate transformation gives the spacetime two distinct asymptotically flat regions, one defined by $u \rightarrow \infty$ and the other by $u \rightarrow -\infty$. Where a singularity once was, at $r = 2M$ (which was only a coordinate singularity anyway), we now see that there is a 'bridge' (now located at $u = 0$) connecting each asymptotically flat region $u = \pm \infty$. This is the so-called wormhole.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your help. One thing that I'm confused about is if we set r= 2m, then u=0, making no time pass. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ It seems like it might be, if only because the Schwarzchild black hole is entirely hypothetical: Astrophysical black holes (for which there's much observational evidence) are described by the Kerr or (if electrically charged) Kerr-Newman metrics, reportedly much more complex. $\endgroup$
    – Edouard
    Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ ah i see. I wonder if you could or if some source can derive the wormhole mathematics from a kerr metric, for a spinning black hole I guess. And I also had some trouble understanding the -infinity to positive infinity, could you show how they found that from the line element? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer (+1) I can see the metric but cannot see a "bridge" in it... Could you state the definition of a "ER-bridge" in terms of the geodesic equations, please? If the geodesic velocity becomes very high between 2 separate points in the 4D volume, is this what's defined as a "wormhole" between 2 points? $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Aug 9 at 6:24
0
$\begingroup$

$u=0$ is on the event horizon of the Schwartzschild black hole, where $r=2M$. By defining $u^2$ to equal $r-2M$, the u coordinate does not cover the region inside the black hole $r$ less than $2M$. Both positive and negative $u$ are outside, being a kind of reflection off the event horizon. I say the interpretation of this as a wormhole linking two different regions of spacetime is a complete mathematical artifice and also untrue, because the metric does not describe a spacetime. The reason is, $du$ has the dimensions of root(length) so is not a spatial coordinate. You can't for example define velocity $c$ using such a coordinate. So I do not ascribe any physical significance to this metric.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ (+1) Can one define a wormhole in plain terms using the geodesic equations, please? When is something a "wormhole" and when is something not a "wormhole"? $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Aug 9 at 6:29
  • $\begingroup$ There's nothing wrong with the metric in the earlier answer. It covers regions I and III of the Kruskal-Szekeres diagram, while the usual static metric covers regions I and II. If you don't like the units of $u$, you can take $u^2=2M(r-2M)$ instead. $\endgroup$
    – benrg
    Commented Aug 9 at 17:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.