I know that an einstein rosen bridge is derived by a coordinate transformation on the schwarzschild metric, but I can't find much on it online, could someone please show how to change the metric into a "wormhole" one and explain it a bit?
2 Answers
The usual Schwarzchild metric is given by
$$ ds^{2}=(1-2 M / r) d t^{2}-\frac{d r^{2}}{1-2 M / r}-r^{2} d \Omega^{2}. $$ We can make a coordinate transformation of the form $u^2 = r - 2M$.
This gives $1-2M/r = \frac{u^2}{u^2 + 2M}$ and $dr = 2u du$ such that the line element becomes
$$ ds^{2}=\frac{u^2}{u^2 + 2M} d t^{2}-4(u^2 + 2M)du^2-(u^2 + 2M)^2 d \Omega^{2}. $$ This is the line element for the Einstein-Rosen bridge. This coordinate transformation gives the spacetime two distinct asymptotically flat regions, one defined by $u \rightarrow \infty$ and the other by $u \rightarrow -\infty$. Where a singularity once was, at $r = 2M$ (which was only a coordinate singularity anyway), we now see that there is a 'bridge' (now located at $u = 0$) connecting each asymptotically flat region $u = \pm \infty$. This is the so-called wormhole.
-
$\begingroup$ Thank you for your help. One thing that I'm confused about is if we set r= 2m, then u=0, making no time pass. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 17:00
-
$\begingroup$ It seems like it might be, if only because the Schwarzchild black hole is entirely hypothetical: Astrophysical black holes (for which there's much observational evidence) are described by the Kerr or (if electrically charged) Kerr-Newman metrics, reportedly much more complex. $\endgroup$– EdouardCommented Jul 28, 2021 at 19:13
-
$\begingroup$ ah i see. I wonder if you could or if some source can derive the wormhole mathematics from a kerr metric, for a spinning black hole I guess. And I also had some trouble understanding the -infinity to positive infinity, could you show how they found that from the line element? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2021 at 19:36
-
$\begingroup$ Nice answer (+1) I can see the metric but cannot see a "bridge" in it... Could you state the definition of a "ER-bridge" in terms of the geodesic equations, please? If the geodesic velocity becomes very high between 2 separate points in the 4D volume, is this what's defined as a "wormhole" between 2 points? $\endgroup$– JamesCommented Aug 9 at 6:24
$u=0$ is on the event horizon of the Schwartzschild black hole, where $r=2M$. By defining $u^2$ to equal $r-2M$, the u coordinate does not cover the region inside the black hole $r$ less than $2M$. Both positive and negative $u$ are outside, being a kind of reflection off the event horizon. I say the interpretation of this as a wormhole linking two different regions of spacetime is a complete mathematical artifice and also untrue, because the metric does not describe a spacetime. The reason is, $du$ has the dimensions of root(length) so is not a spatial coordinate. You can't for example define velocity $c$ using such a coordinate. So I do not ascribe any physical significance to this metric.
-
$\begingroup$ (+1) Can one define a wormhole in plain terms using the geodesic equations, please? When is something a "wormhole" and when is something not a "wormhole"? $\endgroup$– JamesCommented Aug 9 at 6:29
-
$\begingroup$ There's nothing wrong with the metric in the earlier answer. It covers regions I and III of the Kruskal-Szekeres diagram, while the usual static metric covers regions I and II. If you don't like the units of $u$, you can take $u^2=2M(r-2M)$ instead. $\endgroup$– benrgCommented Aug 9 at 17:11