2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand how mass conservation in fluid flow works and how it relates to lagrangian and eulerian control volumes.

The way I understand eulerian control volumes is that they are stationary and feel the change in time at that constant location and lagrangian control volumes follow a parcel of fluid that contains the same particles. I also understand the basic idea behind the material derivative:

$$\frac{Df}{Dt} = \nabla f \cdot \vec{v} + \frac{\partial f} {\partial t}$$

aka the total change of the quantity in time is the one experienced due to motion through space with a certain velocity plus the change at that location.

What I don't get is how this ties exactly with with conservation and the lagrangian and eulerian framework. Is the material derivative refering to a lagrangian or eulerian control volume or is it relating them to each other?

In my class notes it says that mass is in general not conserved in an eulerian control volume but it always is in a Lagrangian control volume (since it always contains the same particles) and that this means that conservation implies $$\frac{Df}{Dt} = 0$$

Does this statement about the material derivative being equal to zero refer now to an eulerian control volume? How can it refer to a Lagrangian control volume, when it implies mass exchange and hence different particles?

I am further confused, because later on in these notes it is implied that there is mass exchange in lagrangian control volumes. The example of advection diffusion systems with the governing equation $$ \frac{\partial f} {\partial t} = \nabla \cdot (D \nabla f) - \nabla \cdot (f \vec{v}) $$

is studied and a particle methods algorithm to simulate them is explained. They state that the computational particles in the method correspond to Lagrangian control volumes and store extensive quantities. It is then stated that from the perspective of the particle $$\frac{Df}{Dt} = \nabla \cdot (D \nabla f) $$ $$\frac{dx}{dt} = \vec{v}$$

Does this mean that the change in mass a particle experiences is only due to diffusion, since it flows through the field with velocity $\vec{v}$ and does not experience any advective flux? If so, is there any diffusion across the boundary of the Lagrangian control volume? Doesn't that mean not the same mass particles are tracked?

This post is super confused and long since I myself am quite confused. Assume you are explaining to someone without foundational knowledge.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Consider binary diffusion of species A and B, in the Lagrangian formalism you would track an N number of particles but a fraction will be A and the rest will be B. If there are gradients in the concentration of A between lagrangian points then A will diffuse from one point to another. Simultaneously, if there are gradients in A then there are equal but opposite gradients in B, so B will diffuse into the langrangian point, effectively replacing the particles of A which have diffused out; this is the definition of binary diffusion.

In the end, A and B will diffuse but the total number N of particles is constant and conserved. So you in essence have two equations of conservation for A and B or for the total number of particles and either A and B (since they are linearly dependent)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is how I understand conservation as well: the total amount of mass remains constant. I am confused because this for me is not equivalent to always tracking the same particles. Why do we say we track the same particles, when what we mean is we track the same sized parcel of mass the whole time? Or is this wrong, can you please clarify? $\endgroup$ Jul 13 '21 at 12:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.