# If we shift vectors any which way in a Cartesian coordinate system, isn't the meaning of the vector changed?

According to 3Blue1Brown, as long as the magnitude and direction of a given vector are the same, even if we move it around in the Cartesian coordinate system, it is still the same vector.

Here, we have a vector $$\underline{u}$$ that is acting in a point $$A(x,y)$$. If, however, we shift it upwards by keeping the magnitude and the direction the same, it is no longer acting on the point $$A(x,y)$$, rather on the point $$B(x\prime,y\prime)$$.

If two objects $$P$$ & $$Q$$ were at points $$A$$ & $$B$$, then shifting $$\underline u$$ from its initial position would change the meaning of the initial representation.

If $$\underline u$$ were at the initial position, it would have meant that $$P$$ is experiencing a force, if $$\underline u$$ were a force vector. But now that $$\underline u$$ has been shifted, the representation means that $$Q$$ is experiencing the force. So, is it correct that we can shift vectors any which way?

• I'm not sure that "it is still the same vector" was meant to imply that the "meaning" is the same too. Since a vector is entirely described by its magnitude and length, it is the same vector after moving it. Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 16:40

He wasn't talking in that sense. It just means that a vector is describe by an arrow in space that has a specific direction and a length. Now it doesn't matter if this arrow is moved around in space without changing its direction and length, It will still remain the same vector.

For example, Consider a vector which point from $$(1,1,1)$$ to $$(2,2,2)$$. So the vector given by

$$\vec{A}=\hat{i}+\hat{j}+\hat{k}$$

If we displace this vector by some amount, say $$(1,2,3)$$, then the point will displace to $$(2,3,4)$$ and $$(3,4,5)$$ but still vector given by $$\vec{A}=\hat{i}+\hat{j}+\hat{k}$$

Now if you add a physical content to it.For example, Suppose $$\vec{A}(x,y)$$ describe a wind flow at point $$(x,y)$$. Now if we displace each point an amount of $$(1,1,1)$$, the vector field would change. Of course, the situation will be changed, Now the wind flow is incorrect. But again, the vector that was at some point $$(x_0,y_0)$$ will be the same vector that is at now $$(x_0+1,y_0+1)$$ in the sense that its length and direction is the same as before.

Edit: Although In physics, One might wanna categorize these cases. So one defines

• Free Vectors A vector-like velocity of a body undergoing uniform translational motion, which can be displaced parallel to itself and applied at any point.
• Sliding Vector - A vector-like the force applied to a rigid body fastened at a fixed point, which can only be displaced along the line containing the vector.
• Bound Vector A vector-like the wind velocity at a given point of space, which is referred to a fixed point.
• @AbuSafwan Please find the edit for additional information. Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 17:05
• Read it; thanks! Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 18:32
• Related quora post. Commented Mar 17, 2022 at 6:04
• Related Commented Mar 17, 2022 at 6:07

Your concern about shifting vectors is well-founded. The problem originates in the sloppy introduction to vectors usually present in introductory physics courses. The video you refer to is not much different.

Let me start stressing where are the problems. From the mathematical point of view, the idea that a parallel shifted vector is the same vector would require identifying all the parallel shifted vectors. Missing that, there would be more than a neutral element or more than an additive inverse, contrary to simple theorems in linear algebra. However, such identification conflicts with some of the applications in physics. For example, when applying a force to a rigid body, the exact point of application matters, for the resulting motion. Therefore, a beginner may feel uneasy with such contradictions. Some partial solution may come from the introduction of qualified vectors (free vectors, localized vectors, sliding vectors, and so on). I never found such purely terminologic difference satisfying.

Actually, mathematicians have clearly identified two related but different sets. On the one side, vectors spaces, which, in 1,2 or 3 dimensions can be graphically represented by the set of all the arrows starting from a special point. On the other side, affine spaces, i.e. a space of points such that a vector is associated with every pair of points. An affine space behaves like a multi-origin vector space. Every statement about translations of vectors is actually a statement valid in an affine space. In this may, it is possible to clearly distinguish the so-called free and localized vectors.