In our scrip we are considering the elastic collision between two particles, one with inital velocity $\vec v$ and the other $\vec w$. We also consider that the particles have the same mass.

Conservation of momentum : $\vec v + \vec w = \vec v' + \vec w' $

Conservation of energy: $\vec v^2 + \vec w^2 = \vec v'^2 + \vec w'^2 $

According to the professor, we have the following relationship between the individual particle velocities and the center of mass and relative velocity:

$\vec v = \frac 1 2 \vec v_s + \vec v_r $.

$\vec w = \frac 1 2 \vec v_s - \vec v_r $.

My question is:

Shouldn't the $\frac 1 2$ multiply the relative velocity $\vec v_r$ and not the CoM velocity $\vec v_s$


1 Answer 1


Suppose you are already in the center-of-mass frame, so $\vec v_s = 0$. Your equations as written give $\vec v = \vec v_r$ and $\vec w = -\vec v_r = -\vec v$ in this limiting case. Moving the factor of one-half to the other term would make this “trivial” transformation incorrect.

If you don’t fix the relative masses, the momentum-transformation relationship is

$$ \begin{align} m_1 \vec v &= \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \vec v_s + m_1 \vec v_r \\ &= \mu \vec v_s + m_1 \vec v_r \end{align} $$

and similarly for $m_2 \vec w$. You should prove this for yourself; it takes about a page of algebra the first time you do it. The quantity $\mu = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}$ is called the reduced mass. In this formulation, each term has units of momentum; the $\mu$ and $\vec v_s$ appear together because they both describe the system as a whole rather than just one or the other of the particles.

It’s more physically meaningful to think of the factor multiplying $\vec v_s$ as $\mu/m_1$ (or $\mu/m_2$ for the other particle’s transformation) than as a magic number $1/2$ to be moved around.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.