0
$\begingroup$

I encountered the need of computing the net flux of a specific intensity given by $$I_{ex}(\theta,\phi) = I_0 \delta(\theta) \delta(\phi)$$ traversing an horizontal plane whose normal coincides with the $ z $-axis of the coordinate system. The variable $ \theta $ is measured from the $ z $-axis, whereas the variable $ \phi $ is measured from the $ x $-axis as usual. The background medium is vacuum. To compute this net flux, I should solve the integral $$\int_{4 \pi} I_{ex}(\theta^{'},\phi^{'}) \cos\theta^{'}\text{d}\omega^{'} = \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \int_{0}^{\pi} I_{ex}(\theta^{'},\phi^{'}) \cos\theta^{'} sin\theta^{'} \text{d}\theta^{'} \text{d}\phi^{'}$$ where $\omega^{'}$ indicates the solid angle. Substituting the expression of $I_{ex}$ into this last integral, I should get
$$\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \int_{0}^{\pi} I_0 \delta(\theta^{'}) \delta(\phi^{'}) \cos\theta^{'} \sin\theta^{'} \text{d}\theta^{'} \text{d}\phi^{'} = I_0 \int_{0}^{\pi} \delta(\theta^{'}) \cos\theta^{'} \sin\theta^{'} \text{d}\theta^{'} = \cos0 \sin0 = 0$$ In these steps I've exploited the Dirac's delta property $\int_{-a}^{a} f(x) \delta(x) \text{d}x = f(0)$, but on some notes I saw a different approach. Firstly, they set $\mu^{'} = \cos\theta^{'}$, which leads to $\text{d}\mu^{'} = - \sin\theta^{'} \text{d}\theta^{'}$ and so they rewrite the net flux integral as $$\int_{0}^{2 \pi} \int_{-1}^{1} I_{ex}(\mu^{'},\phi^{'}) \mu^{'} \sin\theta^{'} \frac{\text{d}\mu^{'}}{\sin\theta^{'}} d\phi^{'} = \int_{0}^{2 \pi} \int_{-1}^{1} I_{ex}(\mu^{'},\phi^{'}) \mu^{'} \text{d}\mu^{'} \text{d}\phi^{'} = \int_{-1}^{1} I_0 \delta(\mu^{'} - 1) \mu^{'} \text{d}\mu^{'} = I_0$$ I don't understand why the two approaches lead to totally different result. Can someone explain it to me, please? Moreover, could you confirm that in the theory of radiative transfer the following convention is adopted? $$\int_{-a}^{a} f(x) \delta(x - a) \text{d}x = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0^{+}} \int_{-a}^{a + \epsilon} f(x) \delta(x - a) \text{d}x = f(a)$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Since $\theta^1=\cos^{-1}\mu$,$$\delta(\theta)\to\delta(\cos^{-1}\mu)=\delta(\mu-1). \left|\frac{1}{d(\cos^{-1}\mu)/d\mu}\right|_{\mu=1}= ...\left|\sqrt{\mu^2-1}\right|_{\mu=1}=0$$

where I have used the formula for $\delta(f(x))$ and only shown the relevant term in the second-last part.


I am not sure about the convention but the equality seems correct.


$^1$ I dropped the redundant single quote on the vars.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank for your quick response. Therefore, every time that the specific intensity has only the term $ \delta(\theta) $ for its $ \theta $ variable, its net flux always will be zero, regardless of other terms. Is it right? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 16, 2021 at 18:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.