# von Mises yield criterion on 'pure' shear I want to predict when a particular sample will yield using the von Mises yield criterion, which in 2D reduces to:

$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{(\sigma_{11}- \sigma_{22})^2 + (\sigma_{22})^2 + (\sigma_{11})^2 + 6 (\sigma_{12})^2 } < \sigma_\text{yield}$$

Consider the shear test above: two beams of the same material connected to each other at the ends. The shear force is achieved through pulling on the samples using tensile force. I want to know at which force yielding will occur in the grey region.

Should the von Mises yield criterion use both the tensile $$\sigma_{11}$$ and the shear stresses $$\sigma_{12}$$ in such a situation? Or would it be considered pure shear?

If not: then what would be a valid example of pure shear?

• The green stuff between the plates is in pure shear. Jun 14, 2021 at 10:04
• @JonCuster ok so if the green is the same material then it would break on the grey part, because that part is under shear and tensile stress, correct? Jun 14, 2021 at 11:40
• Do you understand what shear means? No, the green is under pure shear. Jun 14, 2021 at 13:12
• @JonCuster indeed the green is under pure shear, but the grey is under shear and tensile both, correct? Jun 14, 2021 at 14:22
• what has that got to do with the state of stress in the green? Are you trying to determine whether the green yields, or whether the grey yields? Jun 14, 2021 at 20:17

if the green is the same material then it would break on the grey part, because that part is under shear and tensile stress, correct?

Unfortunately, it's not that simple.

The green region is under very nearly* pure shear, and pure shear is a reasonable idealization there, especially for the interior.

(*I say "very nearly" because pure shear requires corresponding upward and downward loads to avoid rotation: Elimination of any of these forces would result in rotational and translation acceleration: These loads are missing from the left and right edges of the green region but are applied to differential elements within the region due to torques supplied by the gray regions. Therefore, pure shear is a reasonable idealization.)

Very well; with this pure shear $$\tau$$, we find the von Mises stress to be $$\sigma_\mathrm{VM}=\sqrt{3}|\tau|$$.

How about the gray region? For simplicity, and to get the concepts down, let's initially look at an intermediate position on the right side** between the green region and the point of load application. We can apply Saint-Venant's principle, which says that the stress in the gray region far from the end loads doesn't depend much on the details of how the loads are connected.

(**The left side is problematic. If that leftward load is applied as shown, then the object will begin to spin because the moments around any point will sum to a nonzero counterclockwise torque. I'll assume that this is a drawing error.)

The off-center end loads apply both a uniaxial force and a bending moment to that intermediate region. The uniaxial load produces a tensile stress $$\sigma$$, and at the top and bottom of the beam, the bending moment produces a bending stress that could be modeled as $$\pm\frac{Mt}{2I}$$, where $$M$$ is the moment, $$t$$ is the height of the gray region, and $$I$$ is the second moment of area of the gray region cross section. (This so-called Euler-Bernoulli beam model makes some assumptions that you should review.)

The corresponding von Mises stress $$\sigma_\mathrm{VM}$$ in the intermediate region thus lies between $$\sigma-\frac{Mt}{2I}$$ and $$\sigma+\frac{Mt}{2I}$$.

Thus, you could compare $$\sqrt{3}|\tau|$$ and $$\sigma+\frac{Mt}{2I}$$; for a ductile material, the larger von Mises stress will generally predict the yield location (of these example regions being compared).

Now, as you noted in a comment, I've sidestepped the issue of the stress state in the gray region near the green region. The stress in this region contains both normal and shear components, transitioning from the former to the latter as we move toward the left, and both contribute to the von Mises stress. I can't provide a simple analytical characterization of this region because of the loading complexity, unfortunately. At this point, I'd switch to a numerical approach: finite element analysis as enabled by commercial software such as SolidWorks and ANSYS and open-source equivalents. This will allow you to look at points of interest such as the sides of the green region, where the von Mises stress may be very large indeed due to stress concentrations if the corners are sharp. Finally, and in general, I would avoid concluding that if some shear exists in region A and some shear and tension exist in region B, then region B will fail first.

(I apologize if you find everything up to the last paragraph to be an obvious review and the last paragraph to be a nonanswer. You've edited your question and engaged in some discussion since I submitted this answer; it wasn't initially clear to me whether you were familiar combining stress states, which can be tricky or counterintuitive.)

• It seems to me that the principal stresses are along the plus and minus 45 degree lines, even with rotation factored out (since we are dealing with small displacements). One of these principal stresses is positive and the other is of the same magnitude and negative. Jun 14, 2021 at 20:21
• This does make sense, but it seems to side-step the question: if there is shear in the green region, then isn't there also shear in the grey region? Shouldn't we look at the combined von Mises criterion which includes both the shear in the grey region as well as the tensile in the grey region? Or is there zero shear in the grey region? Jun 14, 2021 at 20:23
• You look at each region separately. If your only interest is yield in the green region, then you don't need to consider the state of stress in the gray region. Jun 14, 2021 at 20:27
• @Angelorf Thanks for this comment; I've edited my answer. Jun 14, 2021 at 21:16

The state of stress in the grey region is going to be non-homogeneous, with the stress components varying in both the x and y directions. To a first approximation, the green is exerting a shear stress on the grey region at their boundary. And this causes the tensile stress in the grey region to vary with x from a large value at the pulled end to zero at the other end. And the shear stress in the grey region is going to vary from the from the shear stress at the green interface, to zero at the opposite surface. So analyzing the yield in the grey region is going to require a more sophisticated 2D analysis than you are probably willing to perform.

The Von Mises criteria uses the yield stress from a conventional uniaxial tensile test. Its formula, for the orientation of the principal stresses (where there is no shear stresses) is:$$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{(\sigma_1 - \sigma_2)^2 + (\sigma_1 - \sigma_3)^2 + (\sigma_2 - \sigma_3)^2 } < \sigma_y$$

In the case of a uniaxial tensile test, where only $$\sigma_1$$ is different from zero, it results that $$\sigma_1 < \sigma_y$$ in order to avoid plastic deformation.

There is an orientation of maximum shear in this case: $$45^\circ$$ from the axis of $$\sigma_1$$. Below, the upper figure shows a Mohr circle ilustrating that the shear stress is maximum and equal to half the uniaxial tensile stress.

In the case of planar biaxial stresses, with compressive and tensile stresses normal to each other, and with the same magnitude $$\sigma$$ (bottom figure), the normal stress is zero at $$45^\circ$$ and the shear stress also has the same magnitude $$\sigma$$. In this case, substituting in the formula: $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{(\sigma + \sigma)^2 + \sigma^2 + \sigma^2 } < \sigma_y \implies \sqrt{3}\sigma = \sqrt{3}\tau < \sigma_y$$

The same relation holds for the pure shear test of the OP, for predicting the start of plastic deformation in this case, knowing the yield stress of the uniaxial tensile test. • Where does the $45^\circ$ shear plane come from? Jun 14, 2021 at 15:40
• Given that there is shear present in this example, how would we apply the full von Mises yield criterion (the one including shear stresses)? Jun 14, 2021 at 15:43
• I edited. It is not pure shear, but max. shear stress. You can use the Mohr circle to visualize. Jun 14, 2021 at 16:15