1
$\begingroup$

I tried to fit low baryon resonances to N(1440) in an SU(3) octet.

So I started with

$$\frac{N + \Xi}{2} = \frac{3 \Lambda + \Sigma}{4}$$

What should the respective $\Lambda (I=0), \Xi(I=\frac{1}{2}), \Sigma(I=1)$ be identified with?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The PDG resonance listing to fish from for a lowest resonance baryon octet with 1/2+ visibly suggests

N(1440) ; Λ(1600) ; Σ(1660) ; Ξ(1690) ,

but, beware!, the cascade concluding the above list has not had its spin-parity fully identified.

Still, slipping in a strange quark crudely raises the energy by about 100 MeV as it is expected to, and the Gell-Mann--Okubo sum/difference you appear to be relying on (but why?), in MeVs, seems to zero out adequately, $$ 2(1440+1690) -3(1600) -1660 \approx -200. $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I used formula, because I wanted to check accuracy of linear Gell-Mann-Okubo relation for baryons, firstly matching octet to N(1440) with spin $J =1/2$ and parity $P = 1^+$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2021 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ After the advent of quark models and QCD simulations, the G-M--O formula is somewhat "academic", however, no? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2021 at 21:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.