1
$\begingroup$

If the measuremnt comes between 2.3 and 2.4 why do we write as 2.3 ± 0.1. Why can't we write it as 2.35 ± 0.05. I understand this gives a wrong idea about precision, but why not create a new convention?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ That seems strange to me. I'd write such a measurement in the way you suggest: $2.35 \pm 0.05$. See physics.stackexchange.com/q/523669/123208 BTW, there is another convention: parenthesis notation. $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 3, 2021 at 7:08
  • $\begingroup$ that's the way my book writes it Ncert physics class 11 india $\endgroup$
    – Jahan Zaib
    Jun 3, 2021 at 7:36
  • $\begingroup$ I suppose a case could be made for writing $2.35 \pm 0.1$, but I can't see how they get $2.3 \pm 0.1$. Perhaps you should discuss this with your teacher. I don't want to give you advice that clashes with your school syllabus, and that could cause you to lose marks in your homework or exams. $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Jun 3, 2021 at 8:49
  • $\begingroup$ @JahanZaib Hello! I study in CBSE class 11. Can you please put the complete question, or the question number/page number from NCERT textbook/exemplar. (I am also doing some numerical problems related to error analysis for a while.) $\endgroup$
    – user279106
    Jul 4, 2021 at 2:24
  • $\begingroup$ Your question is not found in NCERT textbook. You asked this closely related question previously physics.stackexchange.com/q/637487 $\endgroup$
    – user279106
    Jul 4, 2021 at 2:38

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.