0
$\begingroup$

two different spring systems

Two identical springs with spring constant $k$ are connected to identical masses of mass $M$, as shown in the figures above. The ratio of the period for the springs connected in parallel (Figure 1) to the period for the springs connected in the series (Figure 2) is $ 1/2 $

What would be the better way to solve this? I have used this law $$\begin{equation} T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{l}{g}} \end{equation}$$ and assumed, $2l$ for the $2^{nd}$ picture but got wrong answer.

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Two springs in parallel effectively behave as a single spring with spring constant $k_\mathrm{parallel} = k_1+k_2 = 2k$ while two springs in series effectively behave as a single spring with spring constant $k_\mathrm{series} = k_1k_2/(k_1+k_2) = k/2$. Recall that the period of a mass on a spring is $$ T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} $$ Which gives $$ \frac{T_\mathrm{parallel}}{T_\mathrm{series}} = \sqrt{\frac{k_\mathrm{series}}{k_\mathrm{parallel}}} = \sqrt{\frac{k/2}{2k}} = \frac{1}{2} $$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ can you prove them (the series and parallel formulas) too? $\endgroup$
    – ABC
    Commented May 9, 2013 at 7:22
  • $\begingroup$ @007 The proofs are here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_and_parallel_springs $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 7:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $k_\mathrm{series} = k_1k_2/(k_1+k_2) = k/2$ how this can be written? $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 7:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In this case, $k_1 = k_2 = k$. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 7:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Got it :-) thnx $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 7:38
1
$\begingroup$

You are using the wrong law .

This is linear SHM. Find out the time period for that , it will be $2\pi \sqrt \frac{m}{k}$

.

Then figure 1 , springs are in parallel and in figure 2 , springs are in series . Do a wiki search to figure out how to find equivalent springs .

An Advice : Don't learn equations blindly .

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ nonagon, @007: Please keep it civil. Both of you. We expect people to be nice on this site. Take this as a warning; further incidents may lead to a suspension. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ 007 is correct in saying that it would be best if you included formulae. However, there is no compulsion to do so. The answer is OK as is. Insulting each other's intelligence is not a way to carry out a constructive discussion; please avoid personal attacks. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2013 at 12:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.