The doubt arose because of this question-
Two thin circular discs of mass $m$ and $4 m$, having radii of $a$ and $2 a$, respectively, are rigidly fixed by a massless, rigid rod of length $l=\sqrt{24} a$ through their centers. This assembly is laid on a firm and flat surface, and set rolling without slipping on the surface so that the angular speed about the axis of the rod is $\omega$. The angular momentum of the entire assembly about the point ' $O$ ' is $\vec{L}$ (see the figure). Which of the following statement(s) is(are) true?
(A) The magnitude of angular momentum of the assembly about its center of mass is $17 \mathrm{ma}^{2} \omega / 2$
(B)The magnitude of the $z$-component of $\vec{L}$ is $55 \mathrm{ma}^{2} \omega$
(C) The magnitude of angular momentum of center of mass of the assembly about the point $\mathrm{O}$ is $81 \mathrm{ma}^{2} \omega$
(D) The center of mass of the assembly rotates about the $z$-axis with an angular speed of $\omega / 5$
It is a popular question from JEE $2016$, an exam annually held for engineering aspirants in India. My confusion is regarding point (D), one of the correct answers.
There are a couple of ways of arriving at $\frac{\omega}{5}$. One way, would be to find the angular velocity in the direction perpendicular to its spin angular velocity, (by finding the velocity of the centre of the first disc, and dividing by $l$) and taking the component of this angular velocity along the $z$ axis. (See $9$:$00$ of this)
Another way, would be to consider the circle the bottom of the first disc traces, and realising that the distance covered on the disc's circumference equals the distance covered on the ground. Dividing the angle covered in time $t$ by $t$ gives us the required answer. (See $4$:$50$ of this)
However, we can also recognise, that the centre of the first disc, moves in a circle about the $z$ axis, with a uniform speed, just like the centre of mass.
If we divide this uniform speed by the distance of the point from the $z$ axis, we arrive at a completely different answer for the angular velocity.
In the shown diagram, noting that the point of contact of the first disc with the ground is at rest, we find that the linear velocity of the centre of the first disc equals $a\omega$ in magnitude (where $a$ is the radius of the first disc and $\omega$ is the spin angular velocity mentioned in the question) and points outside the plane. The component of net angular velocity perpendicular to the rod does not contribute to this speed.
Then, recognising that this centre moves in a circle about the $z$ axis, with a uniform speed $a\omega$, we find the angular velocity of this point , by dividing this velocity with the radius (in the diagram, it equals the perpendicular distance of the centre in the $x-z$ plane, or $l\cos(\theta)$, where $\theta=\arctan\frac{a}{l}$. This distance stays constant.)
This equals the orbital angular velocity of the whole set-up, and the method is what we generally use for finding the angular velocity of any point about an axis. This is the (incorrect) method used in the first 3 minutes of this video
Why is there a discrepancy in answers? Why is this method incorrect in this scenario? I did not find the answers to this question satisfactory.