When I studied physics in High School and in Mechanical Engineering, I learned that friction is separated into two groups:
Static friction (no relative motion) with a coefficient of static friction.
Dynamic friction (relative motion) A.K.A Kinetic friction with a coefficient of kinetic/dynamic friction.
I also know that tires have no relative motion with the ground at the point of contact (as long as you're not slipping). (Same with walking)
So when I look at this IB physics problem from the Oxford IB physics textbook, I get a bit confused.
Now maybe it's a mistake on their part in terms of how they worded it but just to be sure I did some research and found this: https://magazine.mosa.com/en-gb/what-is-dynamic-coefficient-of-friction-five-things-you-need-to-know
Which talks of a dynamic coefficient of friction that is applied to situations including walking (where before we would have used the coefficient of static friction because of no slip). When someone says walking, to me that means no slip, otherwise you wouldn't be walking, but slipping... So perhaps that's an error in their wording as well?
In conclusion, I am currently extremely confused. How are we using a dynamic coefficient of friction to represent a situation in which we are walking or driving without slip? Can anyone help me clarify what is actually going on, because it seems to me like either I don't understand the physics OR the wording is wrong in both the question and in the article I linked.