0
$\begingroup$

Assume an object travelling in a horizontal plane with no friction and in a resistive medium. For resistive motion, I'm being taught that $ma = -R$, where $F=ma$ would be force exerted by the object.

The force $R$ is the resistive force acting in the opposite direction of motion.

My problem is that this formula seemingly implies that net force acting on the object is zero, since those are the only two forces affecting the object's horizontal motion. However, the object still moves. Therefore my first question is why the object moves while the formula implies that it shouldn't?

Also, regarding resistive motion for an object in freefall: we know that drag in fluid or air is a function of (square) of velocity, so it changes with time as object accelerates. Supposing an object is released in the air and enters freefall in a resistive medium (i.e. air). The two forces affecting its motion would then be $mg$ and $R$, where $R$ is air resistance/drag. Since $R$ changes over time, while $mg$ remains constant, what is the other force(s) component in addition to air resistance if net forces are zero?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The net force is not zero and the object is accelerating.

$\vec F=m\vec a$ is Newton's second law.
With a resistive force $R$ in the opposite direction to the motion of the object, which is assumed to be in the $\hat i$ direction, the force on the body $\vec F = -R \hat i$.
$\vec F = m \vec a \Rightarrow -R \hat i = m a \hat i \Rightarrow a = - \frac R m$.

In free fall again there is a net force on the object as it falls in the $\hat y$ direction made up of two forces, the gravitational force $mg\hat y$ and a resistive force $-R(v)\hat y$.
In this case $\vec F = m \vec a \Rightarrow mg\hat y-R(v)\hat y = ma \hat y \Rightarrow a =\frac {mg-R(v)}{m}$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the clarification - just a follow up question: if the net force in a system is zero by Newton's third law, then do you mean the net force acting on the object is not zero? In that case, where do all the other forces to balance it come from? $\endgroup$
    – AlphaBio
    May 1, 2021 at 9:10
  • $\begingroup$ Why are you so worried about balancing forces. To me in the two examples that you have given there is a (net) force which is not zero and so the object accelerates. In the second example when terminal speed is reached the net force is zero and the speed of the object does not change. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    May 1, 2021 at 10:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.