0
$\begingroup$

We know that $$\boldsymbol{E}=-\nabla V-\frac{\partial\boldsymbol{A}}{\partial t}$$

$$\boldsymbol{B}=\nabla\times\boldsymbol{A}$$ But I see that the following changes do not change these fields: $$\boldsymbol{A}\to\boldsymbol{A}+\nabla f$$ $$V\to V-\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}$$

My question is about $V$, why is the partial derivative with respect to time does not change the electric field? why would $$\nabla\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)=0$$ I don't see that explained anywhere, and I fail to understand how that is so trivial for any function $f$ that depends on position and time.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you tried to just plug the gauge-transformed potentials into the expression of the electric field and see what happens? $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Apr 18, 2021 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ I feel stupid for not thinking about the cancelling terms, thought there is a deeper reason for it. Well, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – Darkenin
    Commented Apr 18, 2021 at 14:00

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The zero is due to canceling the part from vector potential change and the scalar potential change in the electric field definition.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

E = −∇V − ∂A/∂t

B = ∇ × A

A → A + ∇f

V → V − ∂f/∂t

When you transform E, you have to transform both the V and the A which occur in E (and note that mixed partial derivatives commute):

E → −∇(V − ∂f/∂t) − (∂/∂t)(A + ∇f) = −∇V + ∇(∂f/∂t) - ∂A/∂t - ∇(∂f/∂t) = E

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.