I know that when vacuum state does not remain invariant under generators of lagrangian group symmetry, we have SSB in our theory: $$ U_{a} | 0 \rangle‎ = |0\rangle‎ \Rightarrow T_{a} | 0\rangle‎ = 0 \qquad U_{a} \in SU(2) \times U(1) $$ in A Pedagogical Review of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Scan by Gautam Bhattacharyya, I found that we can show SSB in electroweak theory by acting generators on scalar field vacuum expectation value (scalar vev) : $$ T_{a}\langle0|\phi|0\rangle‎ $$ the problem is I can not figure out what relation between these two can be according to QM $$ T_{a} ‎\langle 0|\phi|0\rangle ‎\neq‎ 0‎, \quad T_{a}|0\rangle ‎\neq‎ 0 $$


You need to think carefully about what space your quantities act on. $\phi$ is a quantum field (operator) acting on Hilbert space. However, by itself, $T^a$ is just an element of a Lie algebra in some representation. It acts on the appropriate representation space, not on Hilbert space.

Therefore, the notation $T^a \lvert 0 \rangle$ is sloppy. If you go back to Noether's theorem and see how the symmetry generators are defined, the symmetry generator $Q^a$, as an operator on Hilbert space, is actually given by

$$ Q^a = \int d^3 \; \dot{\phi}^\dagger_i(x) T^a_{ij} \phi_j(x) + \mathrm{h.c.} $$

for a multi-component complex field $\phi_i(x)$ and $T^a_{ij}$ in the appropriate matrix representation. This corresponds to the infinitesimal symmetry transformation

$$ \phi_i(x) \to \phi_i(x) + i \epsilon T^a_{ij} \phi_j(x), \qquad \epsilon \ll 1. $$

(I have assumed here a set of quite simple Lagrangians with kinetic term $\partial_t \phi^\dagger \partial_t \phi$, so that the canonical momentum for $\phi$ is $\dot{\phi}^\dagger = \partial_t \phi^\dagger$, but that is not necessary for this answer.)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.