1
$\begingroup$

Depending on the source I have seen two different definitions/formalisms for Non-abelian Gauge theories and was wondering how the two were related.

The first one is the more common where the gauge field $A_{\mu}$ is promoted to a matrix, which transforms like: $$A_{a} \rightarrow UA_{a}U^{-1} +\frac{i}{g}U\partial_{a}(U^{-1}) $$

and the curvature tensor is written with an additional commutator $$F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu} - ig[A_{\mu},A_{\nu}] $$

However in Quantum Field Theory for the Gifted Amateur I have seen the following definition for the above (specific for $SU(2)$) The gauge field is a matrix that transforms like $$\sigma \cdot W_{a} \rightarrow \sigma \cdot W_{a} + \frac{1}{g}\sigma\cdot\partial_{a}\alpha -\sigma\cdot\alpha \times W_{a} $$

Where $\alpha$ is phase rotation $U = e^{i\sigma\cdot\alpha/2}$ and $\sigma$ are the Pauli matrices.

Here the curvature tensor is defined as:

$$G_{\mu\nu} = \partial_{\mu}W_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}W_{\mu} - g(W_{\mu} \times W_{\nu}).$$

How are these two definitions related? I understand that the first is more general to all groups, but didn't know how to derive the second definition from this.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Show the reader the exponentials you worked out, and how you processed them. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 at 16:24
  • $\begingroup$ For the SU(2) group they are the same thing in different notation. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Apr 13 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ @mikestone could use please explain how because it is not clear to me how to derive the expressions for W and G from the general equations $\endgroup$ Apr 13 at 17:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I suggest comparing the SU(2) structure constants to the expression for the cross product of two 3-vectors written in index notation. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 at 18:38
1
$\begingroup$

The first notation hides the Lie algebra generators by writing $A_\mu = A_m^a {\boldsymbol \lambda_a}$ where the implied generators obey $$ [{\boldsymbol \lambda}_a, {\boldsymbol \lambda}_b]= i {f_{ab}}^c {\boldsymbol \lambda}_c. $$ The second notation makes the generators explicit and writes $$ {\bf A}_\mu\cdot {\boldsymbol \lambda}. $$

For SU(2), the generators are the Pauli matrices and commutator algebra of the Pauli matrices tells us that $$ [{\bf a}\cdot {\boldsymbol \sigma}, {\bf b}\cdot {\boldsymbol \sigma}]= 2i ({\bf a}\times {\bf b})\cdot {\boldsymbol \sigma} $$ and the rest should be straightforward.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.