I'm actually kind of confused with two different conclusions from two different sources. It would be great if some make it clear to me.
First, see this stack post : The Time That 2 Masses Will Collide Due To Newtonian Gravity. In this post see the following answer.
It's said that
$$ t = T/2 = \frac{\pi a^{3/2}}{\sqrt{\mu}} = \pi\sqrt{\frac{r_0^3}{8G(M+m)}}. $$
First I don't understand How $t=T/2$. As the orbital period is the time taken to go from the apocentre (the point of greatest distance) to the pericentre (the point of smallest distance) and back. And in time $t$ the planet can only go from apocentre to pericenter so that should be $T/4$.
We are given the following problem as an assignment:
A binary system consists of two stars of equal mass $m $ orbiting each other in a circular orbit under the influence of gravitational forces. The period of the orbit is $\tau$. At $t=0$, the motion is stopped and the stars are allowed to fall towards each other. After what time $t$, expressed in terms of $\tau$, do they collide?
No from the above reasoning, it looks like it's directly $$t=\frac{\tau}{2}$$
But it's not! The solution to a given problem is done as
Now the problem as I can see is with the use of the major axis and semi-minor axis.
In stack post!
Here $r_0$ which is an initial separation between the planet is taken as $major axis$ which seems reasonable.
In Picture show
Here first the time period written is in term of the semi-major axis. and this is taken as the initial distance between the planets which is kind of confusing. I don't get how this is?
Can Anyone point out flaws in either of the two?