2
$\begingroup$

It's well known that condensed matter Hamiltonians of the form $$\mathcal{H} = t\sum_{\langle i j \rangle} a_i^\dagger a_j + a_j^\dagger a_i$$ where $a_i$ are bosonic creation/annihilation operators, are readily solved by the discrete Fourier transformed operators $$a_k = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_i e^{ikj}a_j$$

It can be shown that these operators obey canonical bosonic commutation relations, i.e.

$$[a_k, a_q^\dagger] = \delta_{k,q}, [a_k, a_q] = [a^\dagger_k,a^\dagger_q]=0$$

I have a frustrated ferromagnetic system that I am solving by a first-order Holstein-Primakoff transformation on the spin operators, which naturally gives rise to terms in the Hamiltonian of the form $a_i a^\dagger_{i+1}$. As these correspond to different real-space sites, I would assume that they commute. This would seem to imply

$$ \sum_j a_j a^\dagger_{j+1} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{j,k,q}e^{ikj}a_ke^{-ik'j-ik'}a_{k'}^\dagger = \sum_k a_k a^\dagger_ke^{-ik}$$ $$ = \sum_j a^\dagger_{j+1}a_j = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{j,k,q}e^{-ik'j-ik'}a_{k'}^\dagger e^{ikj}a_k = \sum_k a^\dagger_k a_ke^{-ik}$$

The right hand sides of these two lines differ by a factor of $N$, which is a contradiction. Where is the mistake in this argument?

EDIT: part b) of the question - how does this influence the interpretation of the summand as a dispersion relation for the ground state? If arbitrary factors of e^ik can be added, does this mean that cos(k) can be added to and subtracted from the ground state energy arbitrarily?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I hope that I do not misunderstand something about your question, but $e^{-ik}$ goes once around the unit circle, so $$0=\sum_k e^{-ik} = \sum_k (a_k a_k^\dagger-a_k^\dagger a_k) e^{-ik}=\sum_k a_k a_k^\dagger e^{-ik}-\sum_ka_k^\dagger a_k e^{-ik}$$ and thus, $$\sum_k a_k a_k^\dagger e^{-ik}=\sum_ka_k^\dagger a_k e^{-ik}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What does this mean if you regard the summand as a Bloch hamiltonian? can factors of cos(k) be added/subtracted without changing the physical ground state? $\endgroup$ Mar 18 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ @catalogue_number: I'm afraid that is beyond my knowledge. I have just consistently used the algebraic properties of the Fourier basis and the commutation relation of the creation/annihilation operators in k-space. $\endgroup$
    – oliver
    Mar 18 at 21:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.