0
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to find the viscosity of three fluids for a lab. We measured how fast a metal ball will fall through each fluid. we were given:

mass of ball = 8.5g, radius of ball - 5.94mm

from this I found a density of 9682.13kg/m^3

One of the fluids used was water. The experimental density of water was found to be 990 kg/m^3

the time it took the ball to fall 10cm in the water was 3.12sec, making the velocity 0.032m/s

We calculated viscocity using the formula : $$\mu =\frac{2g\,r_{ball}^2(\rho_{ball} - \rho_{fluid})}{(9\,v_{ball})}$$

when I did this I got 20.877 Pas. The accepted viscosity of water should be around 0.001Pas, so I'm just wondering what I'm doing wrong here.

I also rearranged the viscosity equation to find velocity using 0.001Pa*s for viscosity, and I got a velocity of 668.58m/s which seems way too fast. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Check for unit consistency. $\endgroup$ – David White Mar 9 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ Do you notice anything wrong with the units? I've gone through it a couple times and I thought I had everything converted correctly. $\endgroup$ – catman Mar 9 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ If you are using Stokes Law then do check the formula.. you seem to have a lot of extra factors $\endgroup$ – TheImperfectCrazy Mar 9 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to physics.SE! Please do not post formulae as plain text, but use MathJax instead. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Mar 9 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ I accidentally typed the formula in wrong. It should be fixed now. This is the formula the professor told us to use. $\endgroup$ – catman Mar 9 at 16:51
0
$\begingroup$

Assuming that there is nothing wrong in calculation (I haven't verified this), what might be going wrong is the fact that Stokes Law relates viscosity with the terminal velocity. So, $3 cm$ distance is not enough for the object to attain terminal velocity.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ That's what I was thinking too, but would that account for such a big difference? Also, let me know if I'm understand this wrong but would that then make the terminal velocity of the ball in water 668.58m/s? $\endgroup$ – catman Mar 9 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ No to both questions actually. I find the density very strange. I don't think any metal element thats commonly used has that high density. So that would mean either the mass measurement has a large error or there is an error with radius measurement $\endgroup$ – TheImperfectCrazy Mar 9 at 17:12
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thank you so much for the feedback. The mass and radius of the ball were given to us by the professor, so I'm assuming she just made them up and didn't really think about it too much. $\endgroup$ – catman Mar 9 at 17:21
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh.. that explains the weirdness. Just to give an eg Iron only has a density of $7800\,Kg/m^3$. Your density seems to be pretty high for ordinary materials. $\endgroup$ – TheImperfectCrazy Mar 9 at 17:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.