Assume that we have a QFT with one scalar field $\phi$ with mass $m$ and the Lagrangian $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{EFT}, \mathrm{off}}=& \frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_{\mu} \phi\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{2} m^{2} \phi^{2} \\ &-\frac{C_{4}}{4 !} \phi^{4}-\frac{C_{6}}{6 ! M^{2}} \phi^{6}-\frac{\tilde{C}_{6}}{4 ! M^{2}} \phi^{3} \square \phi-\frac{\hat{C}_{6}}{2 M^{2}}(\square \phi)^{2} \end{aligned}.$$ The propagator for $\phi$ in momentum space will then be something like $$\frac{i}{p^2-m^2 + i\epsilon}.$$

The Feynman rule for this propagator is usually represented by a straight line.

In some lecture notes (that I'm unfortunately not allowed to share here) we consider all $1PI$ diagrams at tree-level which contribute to the two-point function, i.e. only one diagram, a straight line. The amplitude of this diagram is written down as $$\mathcal{M}_2 = i (p^2-m^2).$$


I don't understand why the propagator and amplitude don't coincide. I mean, just looking at the units these two things don't seem to be related, but we still use the same description in terms of Feynman diagrams, which seems weird. Is there a connection? How can I see it?

  • $\begingroup$ Sounds like an inverse or an amputated propagator. Consider to provide some more context. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Mar 2 at 13:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ possible duplicate? physics.stackexchange.com/q/194986/84967 $\endgroup$ – AccidentalFourierTransform Mar 2 at 13:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic added hopefully some details to make it clearer. $\endgroup$ – Sito Mar 2 at 13:44
  • $\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform Very well possible, but I'm still having trouble connecting the dots here... $\endgroup$ – Sito Mar 2 at 13:45

The main point is that the 2-pt functions for the generator $W_c[J]$ of connected diagrams and the generator $\Gamma[\phi_{\rm cl}]$ of 1PI diagrams are each other's inverse (up to factors of $i$), cf. e.g. this & this related Phys.SE posts.

In particular note that for a 1PI diagram the external legs are stripped/amputated. In this process, the free propagator/2pt-function then turns into its own inverse.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.