In general the representation of the time-reversal operator depends on the system that you consider. Let us start with some basic remarks on time-reversal symmetry prior to the spinor question that you are asking.
Time-reversal means to go backwards in time, $t \rightarrow -t$.
When we want to know the time-evolution of a quantum-mechanical state, we need to look at the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
\begin{equation}
- \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \mathcal{H} \psi
\end{equation}
The solutions of this equation are known and can be represented by
\begin{equation}
\psi(\vec{r}, t) = e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar} \mathcal{H}t} \psi(\vec{r}, 0) \quad.
\end{equation}
Using the time reversal operator $\mathcal{T}$ on the wave function above, results in
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{T} \psi(\vec{r}, t) = \psi(\vec{r}, -t) = \psi^*(\vec{r}, t) \quad .
\end{equation}
From the action of the time reversal operator on the wave function we see, that it leads to a complex conjugation of the wave function. Thus, we can simply construct it in the case of spin-less wave functions as $\mathcal{T} = K$, where $K$ is the operator for complex conjugation. More generally we can write $$\mathcal{T} = UK \tag{1} \quad ,$$ where $U$ is a unitary operator. The determination of $U$ in the case of spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ particles, leaves us with the explicit representation for the time-reversal operator.
There are some basic properties, that every time-reversal operator needs to possess.
- energy conservation: $[\mathcal{T}, \mathcal{H}] = 0$
- anti-linearity: $\mathcal{T} i = -i$, where $i$ is the imaginary unit (in fact: one can show that $\mathcal{T}$ is antiunitary $\mathcal{T} \mathcal{T}^{\dagger} = - 1$)
So let us now consider the case of wave functions incorporation the spin degree of freedom.
For a spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ particle we need to fulfill the relation
$$\mathcal{T} \, \vec{\sigma} \, \mathcal{T}^{-1} = -\vec{\sigma} \tag{2} \quad ,$$
where $\vec{\sigma} = (\sigma_x, \sigma_y, \sigma_z)^{T}$ is the Pauli-vector. This relation basically coincides with flipping the spin due to time-reversal ($\mathcal{T} \vec{S} = -\vec{S} \sim \mathcal{T} \vec{\sigma}$).
If we choose $\sigma_z$ to be diagonal, the matrices take the form:
$$\sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},\, \sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\
i & 0 \end{pmatrix},\, \sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\
0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}\quad .$$
If we now use the form of the time-reversal that we found for the spin-less case we find
$$K \sigma_x K^{-1} = \sigma_x,\quad K \sigma_y K^{-1} = -\sigma_y,\quad K \sigma_z K^{-1} = \sigma_z \tag{3} \quad .$$
From $(1)$, $(2)$ and $(3)$ we can simply show that $U = c \sigma_y$. As we require unitarity for $U \Rightarrow UU^{\dagger} = 1$ $\Rightarrow$ $|c|^2 = 1$ and we can choose $c = 1$.
This leaves us with the desired result.
\begin{equation}
\boxed{\mathcal{T} = \sigma_y K}
\end{equation}
PS: that your time-reversal operator contains an additional $i$ could be because of the chosen representation of the Pauli matrices but either way your operator fulfills the criteria to serve as time-reversal operator, as $|i|^2 = 1$.
To develop a deeper understanding, I encourage you to read the relevant chapters in Dresselhaus' Group Theory - Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter.