0
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Landau / Liftshitz vol. 6 on fluid mechanics, and I encountered the expression (page 45, top):

$$\frac{\partial v_i}{\partial x_k} + \frac{\partial v_k}{\partial x_i}.$$

The expression above is referred to as a sum - hence the Einstein notation - and that got me thinking: Do I sum over both i and k, as

$$\sum_i \sum_k\left( \frac{\partial v_i}{\partial x_k} + \frac{\partial v_k}{\partial x_i} \right)$$

giving $9\cdot 2 = 18$ terms (in 3D)? I only ever encountered the summation convention in products before, but I guess both indices are repeated.

Thanks in advance

Edit:

I guess it calls for more context - thanks for ideas. It comes up when he's trying to deduce the form of the viscous stress tensor $\sigma_{ik}'$. Based on uniform rotation ($\vec{v} = \vec{\Omega} \times \vec{r}$) and linearity he concludes that only special linear combinations like the one i'm asking about can occur (so that when $\vec{v} = \vec{\Omega} \times \vec{r} \rightarrow \sigma_{ik}'=0$). He then concludes that the most general form of $\sigma_{ik}$ is:

$$\sigma_{ik}' = \eta \left( \frac{\partial v_i}{\partial x_k} + \frac{\partial v_k}{\partial x_i} - \frac{2}{3} \delta_{ik} \frac{\partial v_l}{\partial x_l} \right) + \zeta \delta_{ik} \frac{\partial v_l}{\partial x_l}$$

I couldn't really see how he concluded that last expression. I thought the clue might lie in the expression I first asked about, but it might be something else I'm missing.

New contributor
Albert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I haven’t got L&L but is is very unusual to assume non-repeated indices are summed over. Usually one adds the summation symbol explicitly. $\endgroup$ – Oбжорoв 2 days ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, it literally is a sum of two terms. Are you sure L&L mean something more complicated? $\endgroup$ – Anyon 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give more context? Often you can infer from the context whether that object should still have indices or not. $\endgroup$ – noah 2 days ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Einstein summation only occurs when an index appears twice in the same term. $\endgroup$ – G. Smith 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ It's the Strain Rate Tensor. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – Expert Nonexpert 2 days ago
0
$\begingroup$

Your formula for $\sigma_{ik}$ is $9$ equations, not one. If you set $k=i$, you sum over the now repeated $i$, obtaining the trace of $\sigma$. But if you sum the $9$ equations, you get something that isn't invariant under arbitrary linear coordinate transformations (the sum of entries of a matrix, even if square, is coordinate-dependent). This is why we don't sum over an index unless it's repeated per term ($A_i+B_i$ doesn't "repeat" $i$ in this sense).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Albert is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.