0
$\begingroup$

Two-state quantum systems in a superposition of energy eigenstates oscillate with time between the possible states. If both energy eigenstates contribute with the same amplitude, the oscillation is between definite state $ \uparrow $ and definite state $ \downarrow $:

$$ A_1^2 + A_2^2 = 1 $$ $$ \psi(\uparrow,t) = A_1 \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot e^{ -i \cdot E_1 \cdot t / \hbar } + A_2 \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot e^{ -i \cdot E_2 \cdot t / \hbar } $$ $$ \psi(\downarrow,t) = A_1 \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot e^{ -i \cdot E_1 \cdot t / \hbar } - A_2 \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cdot e^{ -i \cdot E_2 \cdot t / \hbar } $$ $$ |\psi(\uparrow,t)|^2 = \frac{1}{2} + A_1 \cdot A_2 \cdot \cos (t \cdot ( E_2 - E_1 ) / \hbar ) $$ $$ |\psi(\downarrow,t)|^2 = \frac{1}{2} - A_1 \cdot A_2 \cdot \cos (t \cdot ( E_2 - E_1 ) / \hbar ) $$

$ A_1 $ is the contribution of the eigenstate with energy $ E_1 $ and $ A_2 $ is the contribution of the eigenstate with energy $ E_2 $. $ A_1 $ and $ A_2 $ are assumed to be real in this calculation.

There seem to be solutions with unequal amplitudes $ A_1 $ and $ A_2 $ of the energy eigenstates where the oscillation of probabilities is reduced in amplitude and so never reaches the definite states. It seems that after measuring the state in such a system, the amplitudes of energy eigenstates need to be equal and the expectation value for the energy changed.

Yet I cannot find any mention of such solutions in theory or in nature. Have I made a mistake or are they prevented by some principle?

Edit: Maybe measuring the spin of an electron in a magnetic field along an arbitrary axis is the same as switching to an arbitrary basis? That might look like an unequal energy superposition in the new basis?

$\endgroup$
16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps you could provide some equations. It could make it easier to follow your thoughts. $\endgroup$
    – Jakob
    Feb 23 at 9:59
  • $\begingroup$ @Jakob go to brunni.de/quantum_mechanics and search for "final description of the system". It's a work in progress - writing it up in this way seems to improve my understanding. $\endgroup$
    – brunni
    Feb 23 at 10:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that questions should be self-contained; you should provide every necessary information in order to properly understand your question. This also improves the probability you will receive sophisticated answers. $\endgroup$
    – Jakob
    Feb 23 at 10:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Jakob I've added my general equation for the probabilities to the question $\endgroup$
    – brunni
    Feb 23 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest using different labels for the energy states ($1$ and $2$) and for the superpositions (e.g., $\pm$ or $a,b$). Perhaps this already clarifies something... $\endgroup$ Feb 23 at 11:02
0
$\begingroup$

Certain systems - like electron spin - can be described by a two-state system plus changes of basis. The change of basis corresponds to measurement of spin along a different direction in space and can look like an unbalanced superposition from the point of view of the new basis.

All possible states of a two-state system can be represented as points on the Bloch sphere and opposite points on that sphere always form a basis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloch_sphere

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.