7
$\begingroup$

Since there is no way to tell neutrinos and antineutrinos apart, does conservation of lepton number make any sense?

As far as we can tell, the neutrinos and antineutrinos are indistinguishable so from the empirical point of view lepton number is not a conserved quantity?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do you think there is no way to tell neutrinos and antineutrinos apart? $\endgroup$ – kaylimekay Feb 2 at 9:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neutrinos and antineutrinos have different chirality so you can tell them apart. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Feb 2 at 9:43
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie: But you can overtake them so chirality isn't absolute. $\endgroup$ – Joshua Feb 2 at 19:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Joshua you are thinking of helicity not chirality. $\endgroup$ – John Rennie Feb 2 at 19:21
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnRennie: All right, so how else do you observe chirality? $\endgroup$ – Joshua Feb 2 at 19:26
12
$\begingroup$

Neutrinos and antineutrinos are indistinguishable by most of their qualities, butt not all. One of the quantities that distinguish them is exactly the lepton number, which make them interact with other particles in a different way. For example, a neutrino can take part in the reaction $$ n + \nu_e \rightarrow p^+ + e^-$$ but antineutrino can't; on the other hand, antineutrino can take part in the reaction $$ p^+ + \bar\nu_e \rightarrow n + e^+$$ while neutrino can't.

There's also a difference in a property chirality. All neutrinos are left-chiral, and all antineutrinos are right-chiral.

At least, that's the case in the Standard Model of particles. There are some extensions of SM that allow the neutrino to be its own antiparticle (so neutrino and antineutrino are not only indistinguishable, they are the same particle), and in these extensions the lepton number is indeed not conserved.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ "not only indistinguishable, they are the same particle" Forgive me if I misunderstand something here, but those two mean the same thing, don't they? $\endgroup$ – Arthur Feb 2 at 21:36
3
$\begingroup$

Since there is no way to tell neutrinos and antineutrinos apart

There is. Neutrinos are distinguished from antineutrinos since they have opposite signed lepton number and opposite chirality relative to each other. They were also first detected in 1956 as part of an experiment to first detect neutrinos.

does conservation of lepton number make any sense?

Yes. Conservation of lepton occurs in beta decay for example. In beta decay

$$n \rightarrow p^{+} + e^{-} + \bar \nu$$

or

$$p^{+} \rightarrow n + e^{+} + \nu$$

where in the first reaction, lepton number before = 0 and after +1 + (-1) and for the second reaction, 0 = -1 + (+1). Clearly conservation of lepton number is followed (and the same for all other interactions involving neutrinos and antineutrinos) and does indeed make sense.

lepton number is not a conserved quantity?

Yes, it most certainly is.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.