0
$\begingroup$

Searching online about this topic only gives results about nucleosynthesis (making elements by nature) and the 24 radioactive artificial elements.

Why isn't there any information about methods to make any common stable elements, especially about making rare earth elements, from abundant elements like hydrogen/silicon?

Mass production of elements may be not cost effective than nature resource for now (who will know what breakthrough can make it a different story in the future?), but at least for curiosity any common elements could be tried to be made in the labs, with something like super high energy laser which can even emulate supernova environments.

It's like:

Nature law+Invention by human=Anything

Are they already made, or what is the reason that they (or some of them) can't be made? What is the difficulty towards the invention of such methods and apparatus?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Easiest with thermal neutrons (sit in a reactor), but using high energy protons or alphas can also drive a number of nuclear reactions. But there really is no path to being cost effective in the next millenia or so... $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Jan 25, 2021 at 14:14
  • $\begingroup$ Technetium production: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium#Neutron_activation $\endgroup$
    – Gert
    Jan 25, 2021 at 15:45

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

To get the information you wish, you'll need to dig a little deeper, as follows.

For any element in the periodic table, it is possible to calculate the quantity of work required to squeeze its constituent protons and neutrons together hard enough to stick. This is called the nuclear binding energy and is analogous to the heat of formation of a chemical compound. How to calculate this?

Knowing the individual masses of the protons, neutrons and electrons in any element, you can sum these together and compare the sum with the actual atomic mass of the element. For elements lighter than iron, there is a net energy release when the protons and neutrons fuse together and the actual mass is less than the sum. That mass difference is called the mass defect which is equal (via E = mc^2) to the energy released when the protons and neutrons fuse themselves together. For elements heavier than iron, the actual mass is greater than the sum which means net positive work must be done to create that nucleus (i.e., the nucleus contains stored potential energy, again equal via E=mc^2 to the mass difference).

In your example, where you wish to manufacture rare elements by squeezing other common elements together, E= (delta m)c^2 is the number you want. However, note the following:

This process can be carried out in a particle accelerator, where lighter particles are shot at heavier nuclei to produce still-heavier nuclei. But this is hugely inefficient because 1) the energy cost to speed up the "bullets" is enormous and 2) the vast majority of the lighter bullets either miss their target nuclei entirely, bounce off without sticking, or actually shatter the target to pieces.

That gross inefficiency makes it completely infeasible to build up rare elements in the lab compared to the cost of digging holes in the earth's crust, hauling ore to the surface, and purifying it to get those same elements.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.