2
$\begingroup$

I am interested in computing the Wigner transform in $R^{2n}$ of $$e^{-\beta H}$$ where $$H = \sum_{k=1}^n P_k^2 + V(x_1, \ldots,x_n)$$ I am assuming that $V$ is a polynomial bounded below and obviously $$P_k= -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}$$ I am not necessarily interested in the exact result. In particular, I would like to know if the Wigner function tends to the corresponding classical exponential for $\hbar \to 0$. Some references on these issues would be welcome.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My gut says that if Balescu's book doesn't have anything, nobody does. Andre Voros' papers must address such things, but I don't know which one... Even for one dumb oscillator, the most "classical potential", the Wigner transform is a star exponential, a virtual monster when it comes to multiplex and study the classical limit thereof....It is the example that made a fool of von Neumann's book by his acolyte and admirer Groenewold. $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jan 22 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ Background? $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Jan 22 at 20:41
  • $\begingroup$ I am dealing with some topics of strict quantization maps and ssb and I am trying to construct an example. Thanks for the reference! $\endgroup$ – Valter Moretti Jan 22 at 21:36
1
$\begingroup$

Your question completely outranges my competence, but Balescu's famous book might be addressing it, at some level. In your shoes, I might choose an oscillator potential and resolve your hamiltonian to decoupled normal modes, which should be tractable with the celebrated (by dint of its non-triviality!) result for just one oscillator, I thought I might review below. It would only be useless if it were universally in mind.

Work in natural units of the problem, $m=1, ~~\omega=1$, i.e. absorb $\sqrt{m\omega}$ into x and 1/p, and $1/\omega$ into H, rendering it as $H=(p^2+x^2)/2$. The quantum hamiltonian is then $\hat H=(\hat p^2+\hat x^2)/2$, whose Wigner transform is $H=(p^2+x^2)/2$.

The Groenewold-Moyal correspondence of QM operators to phase space variables x and p dictates that the Weyl transform of $\exp(-\beta \hat H)$ is $\exp_\star (-\beta H)$, the star exponential representing formally the power expansion of the exponential with powers supplanted by $\star$-powers.

$$ \exp_\star \left ( -\beta H \right ) = \exp_\star \left ( -\beta H \right ) \star 1 \nonumber \\ =\exp_\star \left ( -\beta H \right )\star 2\pi\hbar \sum_n f_{n} =2\pi\hbar \sum_n e^{-\beta E_n }f_{n} ~, \label{spectral} $$ which is thus a generating function for the stargenfunctions $f_n$. Of course, for $\beta =0$, the obvious identity resolution is recovered.

This Wigner transform, then, is directly seen (Bartlett-Moyal) to sum to \begin{equation} \exp_\star \left (-\beta H \right )= \left ( \cosh(\frac{ \beta \hbar}{2})\right ) ^{-1} \exp\left ( \frac{-2}{\hbar} \tanh(\frac{\beta\hbar}{2}) H\right ) , \end{equation} which is to say just a Gaussian in phase phase, with the proper classical $\hbar\to 0$ limit, the starting point.

Details and clarifications could be found in our short booklet, section 0.14 (time evolution).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.