Charges are transferred by electrons which we all know. But why can't it be transferred by protons? Well, I searched on Google where I found similar questions already being asked on many sites. However, I didn't find any answers. They were saying that electrons are mobile and similarly protons are busy being nucleons. Also, someone was saying, "By the simple mechanism of separating two things, electrons are pulled out of their Fermi energy levels and into a conduction band to effect charge transference and the creation of a static charge" which I didn't understand at all.
You can totally transfer charge using protons. Or using Na+ or any kind of charged particle. It happens all the time - if you look at how a wet cell battery works, you'll find that while charge across the wire is carried by electrons, current flows along the salt bridge via charged ions (theoretically protons could be among these). I bet if you could somehow make a superfluid out of He+ or something you could use that to carry charge like a superconducting wire.
I think our intuition that electrons are always the charge carriers comes from the fact that:
1.) electrons are very light compared to protons, so if you imagine putting a proton in an electric field and an electron in the same electric field, the electron will be accelerated 1000x more (same charge, 1/1000th the mass). This means that when there is a charge imbalance and either proton or electron flow could alleviate it, the electrons will flow way before the protons are impelled to move.
2.) electrons are the mobile charged particles in a solid - all the protons are bound in nuclei. Since almost all of our intuition about current flow comes from wires or other solid conductors, we're almost exclusively worrying about electron flow.
Protons interact in ways that electrons do not. They get trapped inside nuclei due to the effects of the strong force. Electrons are not affected by the strong force, and so they only get trapped by the electrical attraction to the nucleus which is much weaker in ionized atoms. Therefore it is easier for electrons to move away from one atom to another, transferring charge.
Let me be more pragmatic.
Where do we observe currents? In solids, in liquids and in gases.
What are solids/liquids/atoms made out of? Of electrons bound electromagnetically in shells orbiting tightly bound nuclei which are made out of protons and neutrons. Atoms are neutral
How can me get an atom to be charged?
This helium atom shows how the two electrons surround the nucleus. The reason is the strong electromagnetic field between the two charges of the electrons and the two positive charges of the protons in the nucleus. The protons and neutrons are bound to each other with the strong force. There is a factor of a hundred at least between the force necessary to separate an electron from the electromagnetic field and separating a nucleon from the strong field. In addition the positive bound protons are shielded electromagnetically by the electrons, one has first to remove the electrons to get at a proton.
Thus it is easy to find the Kev energy to remove an electron around the atom than the MeV energy to free a proton. Thus in the huge majority of materials it is the electrons that carry the negative charge, and positive charges one gets from the remaining ions, which are large and therefore smaller mobility ( large crossection for interactions).
The exception is the hydrogen atom, and we get protons to form a strong current in the particle accelerators . Single protons in matter cannot be enough in number to carry the currents a la electrons. They will tie up with an electron and find a pair to make a H2 molecule.
When charges flow through a surface,they can be positive, negative, or both. The direction of conventional current is the direction positive charges flow. In a common conductor such as copper, the current is due to the motion of negatively charged electrons, so the direction of the current is opposite the direction of motion of the electrons. On the other hand, for a beam of positively-charged protons in an accelerator, the current is in the same direction as the motion of the protons. In some cases— gases and electrolytes, for example—the current is the result of the flows of both positive and negative charges. Moving charges, whether positive or negative, are referred to as charge carriers. In a metal, for example, the charge carriers are electrons.
The only way I know of to create proton flow would be via fusion. I have read that fusing two He3 atoms together yields energy, Lithium, and a free proton; (verses fusing deuterium and tritium (isotopes of hydrogen), which produces energy, He, and a free neutron.) I believe that a stream of protons would have a positive charge and could produce an electron current directly (in something like a solar panel). This is why we need to go back to the moon...there is no natural HE3 on Earth, but the Moon's regolith is loaded with it, as a byproduct of the solar wind.
It is common knowledge that electrons are mobile and therefore used in conductivity. Electrons move freely within the structure of an atom but protons are bound in the nucleus and therefore immobile. Conductivity will therefore occur when electrons move from one atom to another and not protons due to their immobility. We now learn particles are involved in conductivity and this particles will only aid in conductivity if they move.
because electrons can be easly removed where as protons are bonded to neutron so it will become an atomic bomb if you want to remove protons.
I think electrons are free to move but protons are bound with neutrons with higher force of attraction so electrons carry electric current but not protons.
Its simple, electrons are on the outside of the nucleus of the atom. While protons and electrons can be transferred, they are on the inside of the nucleus and if they were transferred it would be considered a nuclear reaction.