Jayaseetha Rau, in her paper Relaxation Phenomena in Spin and Harmonic Oscillator Systems starts from an expression (equation 3.6 in her paper) \begin{equation}\tag{1} U^C(\tau) = \exp(i\lambda\sigma_{1j}\sigma_{2j}\tau) = \exp\left(\frac{i\lambda\tau}{2}[(\sigma_{1j} + \sigma_{2j})^2 - \sigma_{1j}^2 - \sigma_{2j}^2]\right), \end{equation} where $\sigma_{1j}$ and $\sigma_{2j}$ are the Pauli matrices corresponding to two spin systems, to get \begin{equation}\tag{2} U^C(\tau) = \frac{e^{-3i\lambda\tau}}{4}\left[1 + 3e^{4i\tau\lambda} + \sigma_{1j}\sigma_{2j}(e^{4i\tau\lambda} - 1)\right]. \end{equation}

I don't know how to get (2) from (1). Equation (1), in vector form, is just \begin{equation}\tag{3} U^C(\tau) = e^{i\lambda\tau\vec{\sigma}_1\cdot\vec{\sigma}_2} = \exp\left(\frac{i\lambda\tau}{2}[(\vec{\sigma}_{1} + \vec{\sigma}_{2})^2 - \sigma_{1}^2 - \sigma_{2}^2]\right). \end{equation}

Since the square of each Pauli matrix is an identity, \begin{equation}\tag{4} \sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2 = 3I_2, \end{equation} $I_2$ being the $2 \times 2$ identity matrix. Therefore, equation (3) becomes \begin{equation}\tag{5} U^C(\tau) = e^{-3i\lambda\tau}\exp\left(\frac{i\lambda\tau}{2}(\vec{\sigma}_{1} + \vec{\sigma}_{2})^2\right). \end{equation}

I am unable to get (2) from (5).


1 Answer 1


An alternative that may simplify things along the way is using their matrix representation and a similarity transformation. With this I mean using the fact \begin{equation} \sum_{j=1}^3 \sigma_{j} \otimes \sigma_{j} = u \cdot d \cdot u \, , \end{equation} with\begin{eqnarray} d &=& \mathrm{diag}(1,1,-3,1) \, , \\ u &=& \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \, . \end{eqnarray} You can check that $u \cdot u = \mathbf{1}$. This simplifies exponentiation, as you find \begin{equation} \exp \left[i \lambda \tau \sum_{j=1}^3 \sigma_{j} \otimes \sigma_{j} \right] = u \cdot \exp \left[i \lambda \tau d \right] \cdot u \, . \end{equation} Since $d$ is diagonal, exponentiation is trivial. Then you can check that there are numbers $\alpha$ and $\beta$ that satisfy \begin{equation} u \cdot \exp \left[i \lambda \tau \sum_{j=1}^3 \sigma_{j} \otimes \sigma_{j} \right] \cdot u = \exp \left[i \lambda \tau d \right] = \alpha \, \mathbf{1} + \beta \, d \, . \end{equation} This is an equation for diagonal matrices, which makes it simple to solve, and will give you the result for your equation $(2)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi @secavara, thanks for your answer. Can you clarify why $\exp(i\lambda\tau \sigma_j \otimes \sigma_j) = u \cdot \exp(i\lambda\tau d) \cdot u$? I am using the summation convention to keep the expression simpler. $\endgroup$
    – Amey Joshi
    Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 13:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can see this by using the definition of matrix exponentiation: $\exp\left( i \lambda \tau \, u \cdot d \cdot u \right) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!} \left( i \lambda \tau \, u \cdot d \cdot u \right)^k = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!} \left( i \lambda \tau \right)^k \left(u \cdot d \cdot u \right)^k$. Since $u \cdot u = \mathbf{1}$, we have $\left(u \cdot d \cdot u \right)^k = (u \cdot d \cdot u) \cdot ...\cdot (u \cdot d \cdot u) = u \cdot d^k \cdot u $. Plugging that back into the sum, gives you the result. $\endgroup$
    – secavara
    Commented Jan 17, 2021 at 14:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.