8
$\begingroup$

I learnt in an introductory course about quantum mecanics how to work with spin 1/2 particles. I saw how the algebra is almost the same as for angular momentum, but no one ever told me about particles having a spin different from 1/2. I know there are no known particles of spin 3/2, but I am wondering how the eigenstates of the spin operator in z direction would look like, to get a better understanding of what spin really is.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "look like"? Do you mean visually? Or what they look like as mathematical objects? I'm not sure what you're looking for. $\endgroup$
    – Philip
    Commented Jan 12, 2021 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitino $\endgroup$
    – Rexcirus
    Commented Sep 21, 2022 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ There are images of fractional spin Heusler materials at the paper nature.com/articles/s41467-022-29991-1 with the title Observation of fractional spin textures in a Heusler material $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 15, 2022 at 21:43

2 Answers 2

18
$\begingroup$

It should follow most of the same ideas of spin-1/2 and spin-1, in terms of satisfying the general algebra of angular momentum. We can construct the operators with a little bit of work. Firstly in general,

$$[J_i,J_j] = i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}J_k$$

Following that a particle with spin $s$ will have $2s+1$ a spin-3/2 particle will have four states, with z-component of angular momentum $\frac{3}{2}\hbar$, $\frac{1}{2}\hbar$, $-\frac{1}{2}\hbar$, $-\frac{3}{2}\hbar$. We can take these states as a basis, and immediately write the $\hat{S}_z$ operator in this basis,

$$\hat{S}_z = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\left(\begin{matrix} 3 & 0 & 0 & 0\\0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -3 \end{matrix}\right)$$

Now it comes down to finding two matrices $\hat{S}_x$ and $\hat{S}_y$ that satisfy the algebraic equation above given this matrix representing $\hat{S}_z$. Two such examples taken from wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_rotation_group#A_note_on_Lie_algebra),

$$\hat{S}_x = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & \sqrt{3} & 0 & 0\\\sqrt{3} & 0 & 2 & 0\\ 0 & 2 & 0 & \sqrt{3}\\ 0 & 0 & \sqrt{3} & 0 \end{matrix}\right)$$ and,

$$\hat{S}_y = \frac{1}{2}\hbar\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & -i\sqrt{3} & 0 & 0\\ i\sqrt{3} & 0 & -2i & 0\\ 0 & 2i & 0 & -i\sqrt{3}\\ 0 & 0 & i\sqrt{3} & 0 \end{matrix}\right)$$

You could follow this same logic to represent the higher spins as well.

Edit: Instead of pulling these matrices out of nowhere I will show a way to find them. Following directly from the angular momentum algebra, you can construct raising and lowering operators. These take the form $J_{+} = J_x + iJ_y$ and $J_- = J_x - iJ_y$. They take a state with a given z-projection and return a state one higher (or lower) multiplied by a number. Specifically, $$J_{\pm}|J,m\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m\pm 1)}|J,m\pm 1\rangle$$

Given our basis and representation of $\hat{S}_z$ we can calculate the coefficients for the matrices $S_+$ and $S_-$. For example this would give for $S_+$ matrix element $\langle \frac{3}{2}, -\frac{1}{2}|\hat{S}_+|\frac{3}{2},-\frac{3}{2}\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}(\frac{3}{2}+1)+\frac{3}{2}(-\frac{3}{2}+1)}=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sqrt{15-3} = \sqrt{3}\hbar$

$$\hat{S}_+ = \hbar\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & \sqrt{3} & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 2 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \sqrt{3}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{matrix}\right)$$

and,

$$\hat{S}_- = \hbar\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ \sqrt{3} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 2 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & \sqrt{3} & 0 \end{matrix}\right)$$

The above versions of $\hat{S}_x$ and $\hat{S}_y$ can be calculated by plugging these into the definitions of the raising and lowering operators. I find this method of construction clarifies the structure of the matrices ($\hat{S}_x$ and $\hat{S}_y$ only having off diagonal components, and the pattern of minus signs) at least in the basis where you have diagonalized $\hat{S}_z$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The question does not ask anything about $S_x$ or $S_y$. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Jan 12, 2021 at 19:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree, and I did include a lot of information. However, I interpreted the statement, "I am wondering how the eigenstates of the spin operator in z direction would look like, to get a better understanding of what spin really is" to be asking for a general discussion about spin-3/2 in the given basis of $S_z$ eigenstates. Certainly if you are studying spin-1/2 and only talk about the $S_z$ operator you would not get a strong grasp of "what spin-1/2 looks like". Ultimately I would just say it's not a well posed question though. $\endgroup$
    – TEH
    Commented Jan 12, 2021 at 20:10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I agree that explaining $S_x$ and $S_y$ as well does give a more complete understanding of spin. I’ve upvoted your answer. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Commented Jan 12, 2021 at 20:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Even thought I didn’t ask for Sx, Sy, your exemple were very usefull. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 12, 2021 at 21:00
1
$\begingroup$

For spin $\frac32$, there are four eigenstates of $S_z$ with eigenvalues $-\frac32\hbar$, $-\frac12\hbar$, $+\frac12\hbar$, and $+\frac32\hbar$. They are typically written as $\left|\frac32,-\frac32\right\rangle$, $\left|\frac32,-\frac12\right\rangle$, $\left|\frac32,\frac12\right\rangle$, and $\left|\frac32,\frac32\right\rangle$ to show the quantum numbers $s$ and $m_s$ for each eigenstate.

The generalization to arbitrary spin $s$ should be obvious. There are $2s+1$ eigenstates of $S_z$. Their $m_s$ quantum numbers (specifying the $S_z$ eigenvalue as $m_s\hbar$) range from $-s$ to $+s$ in steps of $1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.