4
$\begingroup$

I’m reading Assa Auerbach’s Interacting electrons and quantum magnetism.

In 1.3, it says

In contrast, transition metals and mixed valence rare earth compounds contribute $d$ and $f$ electrons to the conduction band. There, the electrons are mostly localized within a small radius $\langle r_{ij}\rangle \ll a$ around the ions, where $a$ is the lattice spacing.

I wonder why are $d$ and $f$ electrons near to the ions?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Promoted from a comment:

The filling sequence order of orbitas: $1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, 4d, 5p, 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p, 7s$. The energy of orbital $4d$ is greater than that of $5s$, and $4f$ is greater than $6s$. The principle quantum number $n$ mainly determine the size of the orbital. Therefore, the size of $4f$ is much smaller than $6s$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Although these $d$ and $f$ electrons have a smaller energy based on radius alone (a more negative potential energy), they have a significant amount of rotational kinetic energy (based on angular momentum). This makes the $4f$ electron easier to free from its state within the atom. The rotational kinetic energy can contribute to overcoming the negative potential energy of the closer orbital distance. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 at 21:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.