5
$\begingroup$

My question is very highly related to Why doesn't current flow in reverse biased diode?

Basically, I would like to understand in more depth John Rennie answer. At $t=0$, I consider a PN junction not plugged to any generator. Then, I will have a depletion region and something like:

enter image description here

The diffusion of the holes from P to N (and of the electron from N to P) is being compensated by electrostatic force created on the depletion region. Nothing is moving.

Then, at $t=0$, I plug in a voltage generator in reverse biais.

enter image description here

I focus on holes (but analog reasoning holds for electrons). They cannot move from left to right in the depletion region because of the electrostatic field. I could imagine them moving from right to left. They are negligible in the N region so we could believe that such motion is impossible. But they can go from P to the wire, arrive to N and then cross the depletion region.

On the other post it is explained that this gives rise to a transient current that will stop after some time. This is precisely what I would like to understand.

My question

At $t=0^+$, a current can be initiated from the phenomenon I described. Now, in principle $V_{gen}$ can be different from the potential of the depletion region at zero biais.

Thus I guess that what happens is that for a short time: $$V_{\text{gen}} \neq V_{\text{depletion}}$$ (we are not in electrostatic so it is not contradictory with electric laws: $\overrightarrow{E}=-\overrightarrow{\nabla} V - \partial_t \overrightarrow{A}$, electric field is not conservative outside of electrostatic regime)

Then, after this transient regime, things go to equilibrium and I have:

$$V_{\text{gen}}=V_{\text{depletion}}$$

Where of course, now $V_{\text{depletion}} \neq V_{\text{depletion}}^{\text{0 biais}}$.

Do you agree until now ?

We could believe that the physics is now equivalent to a standard PN junction in which the depletion zone would have instead of a voltage drop $V_{\text{depletion}}^{\text{0 biais}}$, a voltage drop $V_{\text{depletion}}$.

But still, there are those "wires" around that allow the holes from P to move toward N. The fact $V_{\text{gen}}=V_{\text{depletion}}$ is for me irrelevant to the discussion, if I replaced the PN junction by a resistor I would have $V_{\text{gen}}=V_{\text{resistor}}$ and there would obviously have a current in the resistor in this case.

What am I missing here ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ s/biais/bias/ $\endgroup$ – Ruslan Jan 15 at 19:01
3
+25
$\begingroup$

I think you understand almost everything, but it seems the crucial thing you’re missing is this:

There will be a short-lived initial current but it will quickly (mostly) stop as soon as the potential at the top end of each wire (mostly) equilibrates with the potential at the bottom end of each wire. This never happens in the case of a resistor.

Let me explain how this happens, and why the resistor case is different. First, to make sure my makeshift terminology is clear, let's look at the picture:

enter image description here

When I say the top end of the left wire, I am referring to the place where the left wire connects to the p-type semiconductor. The bottom end is the place where it connects to the battery.

Now, to avoid a 0/0 indeterminacy, and to be more realistic, we should remember that each wire has some low, but non-zero resistance. This will actually make the analysis more clear. Also, let's only look at the left wire. The analysis for the right wire will be the same.

When you connect a battery to the diode, or to a resistor, what happens? We can think of the battery as some black box mechanism to enforce a constant potential difference $\Delta V$ between its negative and positive terminals, no matter what happens. This will set up a gradient of potential throughout the whole circuit, which will push the current to start flowing counterclockwise.

Let's focus again specifically on the left wire. As part of that overall gradient of potential, the battery created a potential difference between the two ends of the left wire, and the current is flowing from its top to its bottom end.

In the case of a resistor, as we know this will be the case forever, the current will never stop.

By contrast, in the case of the diode, as holes flow through the left wire, the left side of the junction is getting robbed of more and more holes, and will therefore develop a negative charge, which will gradually make it harder and harder for the holes to keep flowing. The same of course will happen in the wire on the right hand side, for electrons.

From the perspective of the potential, the potential at the top end of the left wire will get lower and lower until it (mostly) matches the potential at its bottom end, at which time current will (mostly) stop.

What's the crucial difference between the diode and the resistor? The holes have a very hard time crossing from the right side of the diode to the left side, to replenish the deficit! Why? If we look at the picture again, it would seem that the electric field in the depletion zone should help them cross from right to left, because it’s pointing to the left. So why wouldn't they want to cross?!

The answer is, if any hole makes it to the right side of the depletion zone, then yes, the electric field will propel it further to the left and it will happily cross. The problem is that the overwhelming majority of holes supplied by the right wire "die" way before they reach the depletion zone. And when I say die, I mean they will encounter an electron and annihilate.

The reason I say "(mostly)" several times in the above paragraphs is because there will be some very small number of holes that manage to make it from the right side of the diode to the left side, so some very small amount of current will exist. Even though the right side of the diode is teeming with electrons (majority carriers), thermal fluctuations occasionally produce an electron-hole pair (an electron gets excited from the valence band to the conduction band). If a hole produced this way makes it to the depletion zone without being annihilated (or is born in the depletion zone itself), then it will happily be swept away by the electric field and will make it to the left side of the diode to join its comrades. The tiny current produced this way is called the thermal current.

Note: just to make sure we understand the final configuration, and ignoring the tiny thermal current, in the end the potential everywhere in the left wire will be the same, but it will be lower than the potential everywhere in the right wire, by $\Delta V$, the battery’s voltage.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. However I still do not understand. The right part of the wire (after the generator) will still have a higher voltage than the left part specifically because of the electromotive force. Thus there is always a voltage difference on the wire touching the N, and on the wire touching the P. I think I probably missed what you mean. What do you precisely mean by "top end" of each wire and "bottom end" of each wire. $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Jan 11 at 21:27
  • $\begingroup$ I can see why my terminology might have been a little confusing. I updated my answer, let me know if it's clearer now. In particular, see the paragraph I added at the end where I talk about the voltage difference between the two wires. $\endgroup$ – ReasonMeThis Jan 11 at 22:33
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for my late answer I forgot this post until stackexchange pmed me. What I understand better: hole will recombine in N after leaving P from wire. Thus no hole can cross the junction from N to P. And from P to N they cannot because of the junction E field. Analog (in reverse) reasoning for electron. Allright, this prove no current on the depletion zone exist ! The thing I still miss: what forbids holes to continuously be evacuated from P to N through the wire ? Is it simply that at some point the depletion zone will occupy the full space and thus no more holes available ? $\endgroup$ – StarBucK 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ because I'm not sure to understand this: "the left side of the junction is getting robbed of more and more holes, and will therefore develop a negative charge, which will gradually make it harder and harder for the holes to keep flowing". How the fact there will have a negative charge increasing will remove the possibility for hole to exit through the wire ? For me this will only have for impact to increase the E field on the depletion zone. And this doesn't avoid hole to leave from the wire. $\endgroup$ – StarBucK 2 days ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that's the essence of it. There are some subtleties related to the junctions between the diode and the wires, so it would be more correct to say $V_{diode}=V_{gen}$ instead of $V_{dep}=V_{gen}$, but I think you understand the core logic now. $\endgroup$ – ReasonMeThis 2 days ago
1
$\begingroup$

The electric field at the junction results from electrons migrating from the conduction band of the N-type to the valence band of the P-type, because they fill lower energy states in the process.

The region of the conduction band near the junction loses its precious charge carries (electrons). And the valence band of the P-side close to the junction loses its precious holes.

When electrons flow from the N type to the battery, in reverse polarization, the continuation of the process requires that those electrons go through the wire to the P-type. There, they recombined with holes. So there is a flow of holes from the junction to the left.

The electric field in the junction increases as a consequence until match the battery voltage. But you can say that the same happens with a battery and a resistor, and there is a flow of current.

The analogy can be made, but here the central region is so depleted of charge carries, that the resistor has very high resistance, working as an isolator for all practical considerations. The analogy with a capacitor, with a dielectric without charge carries is maybe more close to reality.

When the polarity is direct, charge carries are forced to the junction, and the natural process of electrons losing energy from N to P continues because the resulting electric field is overcome by the electric field of the battery.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hello. Thank you for your answer. I understand that holes will recombine with electron on the N side. Thus when hole leave P from the left wire, they arrive on N and recombine. Thus no hole will cross from N to P. But what still confuses me is that allright on the junction I will probably have 0 current. But what forbid hole to keep leave P through the wire to arrive on N. Is it "simply" that at some point no holes will even be availables ? Like the junction takes the full space. And at this moment current will stop ? $\endgroup$ – StarBucK 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ If no carries cross from N to P in the junction, the behaviour similar to a resistor is not possible. That is the key at the final of your question. $\endgroup$ – Claudio Saspinski 2 days ago
0
$\begingroup$

Congratulations, you have got most of what you need to understand junction capacitance. Yes, you add a reverse bias voltage, and charge will move from the p-region (and n-region) through the supply. What you missed are two key pieces:

  1. a hole (electron) will not last long in n-type (p-type) material - it is playing tag with the opposite carrier type but is outnumbered a billion to one. The net result is carrier recombination and the minority carrier disappears. (Note - to really understand semiconductor physics you must think about both carriers at the same time).

  2. As the hole (electron) leaves the p-type (n-type) region, additional ionic charge is left behind in the depletion region. This growth in the depletion region continues until the depletion region counteracts the applied voltage. You are now back to a static situation, just with a broader depletion region.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. About your answer: for point 2: ok so at the static situation depletion voltage = input voltage (which seems to confirm my first point), but I was still confused by this as opposite to a PN junction "alone", now wire allow charge to go through them so the physics is not exactly the same as isolated PN junction. Thus I guess this point is answered by your first point. Your first point seem to say that no current will then flow through the depletive region because carrier have been recombined before. Do you agree with this first comment ? $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Jan 6 at 15:14
  • $\begingroup$ If I understood you properly, I still have something I miss. In those explanations even when the voltage of the generator equates the PN voltage, there are still flow of charge carrier (before they recombine). So I guess this flow must stop at some point but I am not sure to see precisely why ? Is it related to a moment the depletion region completly fills the PN junction ? If so could you elaborate a little bit on what happens for currents when this occurs ? Why would the current then be equal to 0 anywhere (for the depletion I understand but why in the wires as well) $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Jan 6 at 15:17
0
$\begingroup$

Your drawing is missing 2 junctions. One between the p-type and the wire, and another between the n-type and the wire.

The voltage drop on these 2 junctions will compensate V_depletion and the wire will be no need potential across it.

See Feynman section 14-4 for a similar discussion

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.