Good afternoon everyone. In defining the shear velocity at the wall $u_\tau=\sqrt{\frac{\tau_w}{\rho}}$ for the incompressible turbulence, $w$ being the wall, I found in some literature that this relation holds: $$\tau_w=\mu \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}|_{y=0}= -\frac{\partial p_w}{\partial x}$$ $p$ being the pressure, $\mu$ the dynamic viscosity and $x$ the direction of the flow velocity $U$. However I don't know neither if the second equality is correct or where it comes from. Could anyone help?
1 Answer
I'm trying to show the second equality, what I've done so far:
From Navier-Stokes (incompressible) in the x direction (take z also along the wall and y orthogonal to them, assuming no field forces) and let $\mathbf{u} = u \mathbf{i} + v \mathbf{j} + w \mathbf{k}$:
$$\rho \frac{D u}{Dt} = \mu \Delta u - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \rho g_x$$
notice that the particle is stopped (zero constant velocity and partial derivatives of it along x and z) along the wall ("no slip") and therefore, from the Lagrangian frame, it has zero (material) derivative. It will reduce to:
$$\mu \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = \frac{\partial p}{\partial x}$$
but I don't know what to do from here. Maybe the sign will be reversed since the shear stress in the fluid is a reaction to the shear stress in the wall?
Edit: checking the dimensions, could it happen that something is wrong with the equality? Since the first two terms evaluate to Pa, and the final one to Pa/m.
Using the reasoning above, could it be something like $$\frac{\partial \tau_w}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial p_w}{\partial x}$$?
-
1$\begingroup$ Thanks for the reply. Yes, the minus could come from the fact that there is a pressure drop in the flow due to friction while the stress is positive; however have you thought how to solve the fact of the second derivative? About the dimensions, I think you're true and this formula can't be correct then. $\endgroup$ Dec 31, 2020 at 15:33
-
$\begingroup$ I wrote a small edit few secs ago, maybe it is related to the derivative of shear stress $\endgroup$– PetriniDec 31, 2020 at 15:34
-
$\begingroup$ Got it. Yes, it sounds reasonable. Thank you $\endgroup$ Dec 31, 2020 at 15:35