2
$\begingroup$

I have a propagator

$$ K=\sum_k\langle x|a_k\rangle\langle a_k| y\rangle \exp\left\{ \frac{-iE_k(t-t_0)}{\hbar} \right\} ~~,\tag{1} $$

which I know satisfies the time-dependent Schrodinger equation

\begin{align} i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}K=\hat HK~~. \end{align}

I am only interested in the retarded propagator so I multiply it by the Heaviside function $\Theta(t-t_0)$. This enforces the condition that the probability density at time $t_0$ will diffuse only into the future. Therefore, I solve

\begin{align} i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}\Theta K&=\hat H\Theta K\\ i\hbar\left(K\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} \Theta + \Theta\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} K \right)&=\hat H\Theta K\\ i\hbar\, K\delta(t-t_0) &=\hat H\Theta K- i\hbar\,\Theta\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} K ~~. \end{align}

Since the $\delta$-function picks out $t=t_0$, I can simplify $K$ on the LHS using (1) to write

\begin{align} \lim\limits_{t\to t_0}K&=\sum_k\langle x|a_k\rangle\langle a_k| y\rangle \exp\left\{ \frac{-iE_k(t_0-t_0)}{\hbar} \right\} \\ &=\sum_k\langle x|a_k\rangle\langle a_k| y\rangle \\ &= \langle x| y\rangle \\ &= \delta^{(3)}(\vec x-\vec y) ~~, \end{align}

which yields

\begin{align} i\hbar \,\delta(t-t_0) \delta^{(3)}(\vec x-\vec y) =\Theta \left(\hat H- i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}\right)K ~~. \end{align}

Now I see that $K$ is the Green's function for the given linear operator. However, in Sakurai's Modern QM, 3rd Ed. (p110), he has a minus sign on the $i\hbar$ on the LHS. Where does it come from?

This question is similar but does not explain where the minus sign comes from.

$\endgroup$
0
2
$\begingroup$

The problem should be the equation \begin{align} i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}\Theta K&=\hat H\Theta K \end{align}

Indeed if you start from \begin{align} i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}K&=\hat H K \end{align} and multiply $\Theta$ on both side you have

\begin{align} i\hbar\Theta\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}K &= \Theta\hat{H}K \\ i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}(\Theta K)-i\hbar\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}(\Theta) K &=\hat{H}(\Theta K) \\ -i\hbar \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\delta(t-t_0)=(\hat{H}-i\hbar \dfrac{\partial}{\partial t})(\Theta K) \end{align}

Below is the result from the book Quantum field theory for the gifted Amateur Ch16 and $G^+$ is itself the retarded propagator which should be consistent with my argument. enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent. I was wrong to assume that $\Theta K$ would also be a solution to the Schrodinger equation. Thanks, you are a cool guy! $\endgroup$ – hodop smith Dec 18 '20 at 3:46
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, let me ask one more question. If the propagator is supposed to be the Green's function, and the Green's function as you have it is $\Theta K$, then that must mean the sign does not matter. Indeed, if the propagator is (like) a wavefunction, then the sign will go away when we square it to obtain some observable. Therefore, I think the equation is correct as I have written it also. Do you agree? $\endgroup$ – hodop smith Dec 18 '20 at 4:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree if we add a minus sign to the propagator then it's like multiplying a trivial phase to the state. $K$ should satisfy the Schrodinger equation so $(H-i\frac{\partial}{\partial t})K=0$. If $\Theta K$ also satisfy then we should also have $(H-i\frac{\partial}{\partial t})(\Theta K)=0$ but instead we have some $\delta$ function which is non-zero only at certain point. I think in your equation the RHS is not operating on $\Theta K$ so it's a bit different and not merely the problem of minus sign. $\endgroup$ – Frank Dec 18 '20 at 4:38
  • $\begingroup$ So then it's $\Theta K$ that is the Green's function, and not $K$? $\endgroup$ – hodop smith Dec 18 '20 at 16:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.