3
$\begingroup$

So, my question is the work done by gravitational force suppose when you lift an object, I think it would be $0$ as it is not causing any displacement in the object even if it is applying a force, so what would the answer be, would it have some non-zero value or be zero? Edit: I understood the question and another question jumped to my mind which is would the work done by gravitational force on a slope be -mgh as well ? I think it would be -mgh as it exerts a force equal to mg and the height gained would be h but since it is in the opposite direction it would be -mgh is this answer right ?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome! I can add a discussion onto how the velocity time graphs evolve as well if you're interested, I personally had this same doubt and thought of it for a long time before I figured it out myself. @KRATOS0990 $\endgroup$ Dec 15, 2020 at 8:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Buraian I would be certainly be interested $\endgroup$
    – KRATOS0990
    Dec 15, 2020 at 9:10
  • $\begingroup$ I've done an edit to my answer, have a look @KRATOS0990 $\endgroup$ Dec 15, 2020 at 9:22
  • $\begingroup$ I saw it and found it quite helpful thanks $\endgroup$
    – KRATOS0990
    Dec 15, 2020 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest posting the second question as another question. $\endgroup$ Dec 15, 2020 at 13:26

4 Answers 4

3
$\begingroup$

It would be zero if there is no displacement, even if there are forces being applied

The equation for work done is as follows:

W = F x s

F represents force and s is displacement(distance moved in a direction). So the work done by gravity would be: (weight of the object) x displacement. As you can see from this equation, if s is 0, W will also be 0. Note that displacement against the direction of gravity would result in a negative value for displacement, and so the work done by gravity would also give a negative value if the object is being lifted upwards, but a positive value otherwise.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Good question.

The energy of lifting an object

The energy takes to lift the object depends entirely on 'how' you got it lifted. Consider balancing the forces in the vertical direction on the body being lifted:

$$ ma = Q- mg$$

Where $Q$ is the upward push you give and $m$ is the mass of the body.

Let's say the object began at the palm of your hand in rest, then you'd have to give a force greater than that of gravity to break its inertia and set it into motion. Let's say $Q = mg + \epsilon$ where $\epsilon$ is some nice function with the property that $\epsilon>0$:

$$ ma = \epsilon$$

And, then let's say after some time $t'$, your object has reached a velocity $v'$ and a height $h'$. Now you got the object moving up, you can stop putting excess force into lifting it up and drop the force you give such that it only balances the gravitational force(**). The work done till this time is given as:

$$ W = \int_0^{h'} \epsilon \cdot dh$$

For visualization, the work done curve would look something around these lines:

enter image description here

There is no work after the point where you stop giving more force than gravity to lift it up because of the fact that at that point your force is balanced but the object will keep moving due to acceleration it had received in the past.

However, do note that however you do it the gravitational force takes out the same amount of energy from the energy you put in which is precisely $mgh$.


Extended edition ( A few graphs to bring out explicit details of the motion):

Let's take the simplest possible acceleration which is $ \epsilon = \epsilon_o$ i.e: constant, I think the graphs are self explanatory:

enter image description here

Left to right: acceleration-time , velocity - time, position time graph


*: If you dropped the force too much, it'd start accelerating downwards again

**: For a more explicit statement of the behaviour the force, I'll define the it as a piecewise function:

$$ Q = \begin{cases} mg + \epsilon, t'>t>0 \\ mg , t>t' \end{cases}$$

Note: The work done calculated is for the extra energy you got to put in to raise it, you can find out the total amount of energy you put in by removing out the potential energy from that quantity.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ When you refer to work do you mean work done by net force? $\endgroup$
    – Linkin
    Dec 15, 2020 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ Yep that's exactly what I mean $\endgroup$ Dec 15, 2020 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ But didn't the op ask if work done by gravity was zero or not? $\endgroup$
    – Linkin
    Dec 15, 2020 at 9:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I put that point of your first comment into my answer. For the second point, I think OP was trying to figure out the energy involved in lifting an object but got confused in how to set it up in the start itself. @JustJohan $\endgroup$ Dec 15, 2020 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ The question is about work done by gravity. This is completely independent onhow thebody is dispalced and what were the other forces acting. Unfortunately many students miss this point. $\endgroup$
    – nasu
    Dec 15, 2020 at 13:24
2
$\begingroup$

You seem confused about the concept of work: In Classical Mechanics, by definition, the work $W$ made by a force $\vec{F}$ is: $$W=\vec{F} \cdot \vec{s}$$ where $\cdot$ represent the scalar product. But what is $\vec{s}$? Well: it is the displacement (a.k.a. the variation of position) of the object on which $\vec{F}$ acts; the cause of the displacement does not matter! If the object moves for any reason then you have a $\vec{s}$ and if $\vec{F}$ and $\vec{s}$ are not orthogonal then you also have a non zero work done by $\vec{F}$. This is the definition of work, $\vec{s}$ has this meaning by definition!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much Noumeno! This really helped me out $\endgroup$
    – KRATOS0990
    Dec 15, 2020 at 9:17
  • $\begingroup$ So the answer is W=-mgh. $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Dec 15, 2020 at 12:26
-1
$\begingroup$

I dont think so. As you said work is done in lifting an object. so here vertical displacement or distance component will be considered.

As W=mgh

W=9.8(mxh) W=9.8 mxh ( if we put h=a then mxh becomes F ) W=9.8 (times F) Joules

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.