Notation: I denote phase space as the symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$, in which $\omega=\sum_i\mathrm dp_i\wedge\mathrm dq_i$ in canonical coordinates.
In definitions of Hamiltonian vector fields I have seen so far$^{[1][2]}$, they seem to state that for all $H\in C^\infty (M)$ the associated Hamiltonian vector field is defined as the $X_H$ for which: $$\mathrm dH(\bullet)=\omega(X_H,\bullet) \tag{1}.$$
We also know that integral curves generated by Hamiltonian vector fields are the solutions to Hamilton's equations, which define time evolution in the Hamiltonian formalism. I am confused why all smooth functions generate Hamiltonian vector fields, and why the very special role of defining the time evolution is not entirely contained in one specific smooth function that we call the Hamiltonian.
It would make more sense to me that if we choose one given physical system we have to single out one smooth function on phase space that we call the Hamiltonian, and this and only this function has an associated vector field that we call "the Hamiltonian vector field" for this system, whose integral curves define the time evolution of the system.
Perhaps this is what is meant in my links and I have just misunderstood. Perhaps they are considering the most general case in which all smooth functions could hypothetically serve as "the Hamiltonian function" for a given system?
References:
$^{[1]}$: Hamiltonian Vector Fields and Symplectic Geometry, Woit
$^{[2]}$: Wikpedia, Hamiltonian Vector Fields