1
$\begingroup$

How do I rewrite a Hamiltonian written as some integral over momenta, e.g., $$ H = \int\frac{d^d \vec k}{(2\pi)^d}\omega(\vec k) a_{\vec k}^\dagger a_{\vec k} $$ in terms of energy eigenmodes?

That is, what's the function $f$, the cutoff $\omega_c$ and what are the modes $a_\omega$ in the following formula: $$ H = \int_0^{\omega_c}f(\omega) a_\omega^\dagger a_\omega.$$

Maybe this can't be done in most cases -- the problem is that $\omega(\vec k)=\omega_0$ is not invertible. So in addition to the integral over $\omega$ there needs to be a sum or an integral over all the states with the same frequency. But I'm mostly interested in cases where it works.

I know about substitution of variables, but I'm unsure how the operators transform. Can $f(\omega)$ be anything and $a_\omega$ still fulfil canonical commutation relations? Mostly thinking about bosons, but shouldn't be very different for fermions I assume.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Converting momentum summations to integrals density of states is a rather basic procedure, which can be found in many textbooks. What requires special care here is the degeneracy of the spectrum - how this one is treated depends very much on the specific problem at hand. For example, in 1D one usually resorts to introducing operators for forward and backward going particles: $$ \omega(k)=\omega,\\ a_{\omega,+} = a_{k}, \text{ if } k>0,\\ a_{\omega,-} = a_{k}, \text{ if } k<0. $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Right, but does the density of states have to appear as function $f(\omega)$? When I do a change of variables, I can choose any function there. I suspect there is some choice for the commutation relations that's usually made? $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Dec 7, 2020 at 10:57
  • $\begingroup$ When you change the variables, the only function you can get there is the Jacobian (in the case of a unique function), which is the density of states: $\int dk ... = \int \frac{dk}{d\omega} d\omega$. $\endgroup$
    – Roger V.
    Dec 7, 2020 at 11:02
  • $\begingroup$ Of course.. thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Dec 7, 2020 at 11:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.