Breit-Wigner formula derivation I have been going over this derivation of the Breit-Wigner formula for resonance in particle physics but cannot reconcile the steps with my knowledge of QM.
The initial state is given by:
$$ \psi(t)=\psi(t=0)e^{-iE_0t}e^{-\frac{t}{2\tau}}$$
Here arises my first question:

*

*Is dependence on position neglected? If so, why?

Then, it is stated
$$\textrm{Prob}(\textrm{ find state } |\psi\rangle)\propto e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} $$


*Finding the state $|\psi\rangle$ where? At time $t$? What does this mean?

We can now convert this to the energy domain by Fourier transforming this $\psi(t)$:
$$f(E)=\int_0^\infty \textrm{d}t\,\psi(t)e^{iEt}$$
and we get
$$f(E)= \dfrac{i\psi(0)}{(E_0-E)-\frac{i}{2\tau}}$$


*Why is this a Fourier transform if the range starts at $0$ and not at $-\infty$?

*Why is this valid? I am used to converting from position to momentum space, but time-energy is something I have never done in QM.

*Moreover, what are the time eigenstates? For position and momentum we have $|x\rangle$ and $|p\rangle$, but for time?

The procedure then goes on and asserts that the probability of finding the state $|\psi\rangle$ with energy $E$ is given by
$$|f(E)|^2=\dfrac{|\psi(0)|^2}{(E_0-E)^2+\frac{1}{4\tau^2}} $$


*Shouldn't it be $|f(E)|^2\textrm{d}E$?

 A: I fear one is shadow-boxing with your undisclosed text. All good QM texts cover this, but one doesn't know what you are taking issue with.
The state is
$$ \psi(t)=\psi(0)~e^{-iE_0t}e^{-\frac{t}{2\tau}},$$
so the probability of it not having decayed is monotonically decreasing,
$$
|\psi(t)|^2 / |\psi(0)|^2 = e^{-t/\tau},
$$
the standard exponential decay law. Could multiply with the number of such particles to get a bulk survival probability, e.g. of a chunk of radioactive material.
(1,2) Any conceivable space dependence has been integrated out, since it is irrelevant to the decay. The state could be anywhere and everywhere in space, and its decay would not be affected by space considerations--think of doing all the space integrals in advance. The square of the wave function, then, is a probability of existence, in the whole universe, of that state, and not a probability space-density.  Note the state is a hamiltonian eigenstate, but the eigenvalue is not real, $E_0-i/2\tau$, because the hamiltonian is not hermitian. The probability of the existence of the state as a fraction of an initial probability of 1, when you start measuring time, is thus decreasing all the way to 0 at infinite time.
(3) Your time range is then [0,$\infty$), and that is what you integrate over, so you are only doing half a Fourier transform, since the full Fourier transform would take you back to an infinite value (duh!), and you only wish to monitor survival probability relative to a starting time 0.
(4) Valid? it is a formal operation:
$$f(E)=\int_0^\infty \textrm{d}t\,\psi(t)e^{iEt}  
= \dfrac{i\psi(0)}{(E-E_0)+\frac{i}{2\tau}} ~,$$
giving you a spectral decomposition of your state, and is useful in the undisclosed applications of your text. It is essentially the propagator of the unstable state in question, providing the amplitude for the decay.
(6) Indeed, normally $|f(E)|^2$ would correspond to a probability density in E, a Lorentzian, or Cauchy distribution, whose (full) FT, as you see, gives you an $\propto e^{-|t|/\tau}$, half of which  you have been using here.
(5) is obscure... Time is a parameter.
