Lets say we have a 1 dimensional system with coordinate $x$ and the associated operator $\hat x$ with eigenstates $|x\rangle$. A function of $x$ is defined as $$ f(x) = \langle x |f\rangle \tag{1} $$ Now we introduce a new coordinate $y$ with operator $\hat y $ and corresponding eigenstates. x and y are describing the same 1 dimensional space. and both sets of eigenstates are assumed to be complete and orthogonal in the the sense of $$ \hat 1 = \int dx ~|x\rangle \langle x|\\ \langle x|x'\rangle = \delta(x-x').\tag{2} $$

The relationship between coordinates $x$ and $y$ is given by $$\begin{aligned}x(y) &= ay \\ y(x) &= a^{-1}x \end{aligned}\tag{3}$$ where $a$ is a real constant.

Due to completeness the function $f(x)$ can be expressed as
$$ f(x) = \int ^\infty_{-\infty}dy \langle x|y\rangle \langle y|f\rangle\tag{4} $$

What is $\langle x|y\rangle$ in this case? What is the relationship of $|x\rangle$ and $|y\rangle$? How would all of this apply to an example function like $f(x)= x^2$?

Does the coordinate transformation define these relationships or do i need more definitions to answer these questions?

I tried the following $$ f(x(y)) = \tilde f(y) = a^2y^2 = \langle y|f\rangle\\ x^2 = \int ^\infty_{-\infty}dy \langle x|y\rangle a^2 y^2\\ \Rightarrow \langle x | y \rangle = a^{-2}\delta(x-y)\tag{5} $$ but that can't be right. The result depends on the function that i plug in, which shouldn't be the case. If had used a different $f(x)$ i would have gotten a different result for the matrix element $\langle x |y\rangle$. Where do i go wrong ?

My goal is to properly understand how a variable substitution, done in position representation, is expressed in Dirac Notation. Preferably starting in position representation and going "backwards" to Dirac Notation. I am uncertain how such a transformation is properly expressed in the more abstract Dirac representation or how it affects the states. I have no trouble doing a coordinate substitution in a integral of the form $$ \langle f|f\rangle = \int f^*(x)f(x) dx \tag{6} $$ for the right side of the equation which is given in position representation but i fail at doing the same in a more abstract manner.

The right side simply transforms to $$\begin{aligned} \int \langle f|x\rangle \langle x|f\rangle dx &= \int f^*(x(y))f(x(y)) dx(y)\\ ? &=\int f^*(y) f(y) |\frac{dx}{dy}| dy\\ \end{aligned}\tag{7}$$ On the other hand i can write the integral also as the following, using the completeness of $y$, $$\begin{aligned} \langle f | f \rangle &= \int \langle f | y \rangle \langle y | f \rangle dy \\ \end{aligned}\tag{8}$$ Now i set both equations expressed in $y$ equal, $$ \int f^*(y) f(y) |\frac{dx}{dy}| dy = \int \langle f | y \rangle \langle y | f \rangle dy\tag{9} $$ which leads me to a contradiction, under the assumption that $f(y)=\langle y | f \rangle = f(x(y))$. Is the error the assumption $$ f(y)=\langle y | f \rangle = f(x(y)) \tag{10} $$ or something else ?

  • $\begingroup$ $x$ and $y$ are independent of each other. How you are defining the coordinate like that? It's rather a function of $x$. $\endgroup$ Nov 28 '20 at 21:06
  • $\begingroup$ The system is and remains 1-dimensional. I don't mean add a new y-dimension to the system. The problem is a simple variable substitution in 1 dimension, where the first variable is called x and the variable to which we switch is called y. Altough it might have been better if i had called it x and x' to avoid any misunderstanding. $\endgroup$
    – Hans Wurst
    Nov 28 '20 at 21:11
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you think $\langle x | y \rangle$ will be fundamentally different from $\langle x | x' \rangle$? $\endgroup$
    – Philip
    Nov 28 '20 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Philip : $\langle x|y'\rangle= \langle x|x'\rangle \sqrt{a}$, so the first line of (5) is wrong. $\endgroup$ Nov 28 '20 at 22:05
  • $\begingroup$ ... whence, for the example, $\langle y|f\rangle=a^{5/2} y^2$, and (4) can be made to work right... $\endgroup$ Nov 28 '20 at 22:38
  1. Under a coordinate transformation $y=f(x)$, where $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a diffeomorphism, the position ket & bra transform as half-densities $$\begin{align}|f(x)\rangle~=~&|f^{\prime}(x)|^{-1/2}|x \rangle,\cr \langle f(x)|~=~&|f^{\prime}(x)|^{-1/2}\langle x|,\end{align}\tag{A}$$ so that the completeness & orthogonal relations (2) transform covariantly.

  2. Phrased equivalently, the wavefunction $$ \psi(x)~\equiv~ \langle x|\psi \rangle \tag{B} $$ transforms as a half-density under coordinate transformations.

  3. We can then construct a half-form object $$ \psi(x)\sqrt{\mathrm{d}x} \tag{C}$$ that is invariant under coordinate transformations. A similar construction is used in e.g. geometric quantization.

  • $\begingroup$ Is there a "hack" that allows me to see this by simple manipulation with Dirac Notation ? Or any sort of "conserved" equations that must hold true after coordinate transformation so i can see that the transformation behavior has to be like this ? I also have trouble to see how this connects to equation (4). Is that equation wrong ? Or is my identification of $\langle y|f\rangle$ wrong ? $\endgroup$
    – Hans Wurst
    Nov 29 '20 at 6:09
  • $\begingroup$ @HansWurst yes here is a "conserved equation" You need $\int dx f^\star(x) f^(x)=1$ in any coordinate system; therefore $f^\star(x)f(x)$ must be the value of a tensor density of weight 1 at a point $x$. $\endgroup$
    – user21299
    Nov 29 '20 at 7:07

I'm not sure what hack you'd be asking for in your comment to the good answer. You are meant to apply the transformation laws of the impeccable answer already provided to your scaling, (3), a change of basis, $$ |y\rangle = \sqrt{a} |x\rangle,~~ \leadsto ~~\langle x|y'\rangle = \sqrt{a} \langle x |x'\rangle. $$

The sensible version of your (4) then reads $$ f(x)= \int dy'~ \langle x|y'\rangle \langle y'|f\rangle=a^{-1/2}\int dy' ~\langle y|y'\rangle \langle y'|f\rangle = a^{-1/2} \langle y|f\rangle, $$ so your (5) and (10) are wrong. Recall what you do with coordinate and momentum space wavefunctions. You may write their correct, consistent, versions by the above, or for your example. Do you want me to do this?

In response to comment. For your simple scaling (3), recall $$ \hat{y}|y\rangle= y|y\rangle=x/a|x/a\rangle=\hat x /a|x/a\rangle, \leadsto \\ = \hat x |x/a\rangle=x|x/a\rangle, \leadsto \\ |x/a\rangle\propto |x\rangle. $$ What is the proportionality constant? $|y\rangle = \sqrt{a} |x\rangle$, so $$ \langle y|y'\rangle=\delta (y-y')=a \delta (x-x')=a\langle x|x'\rangle, $$ and $dx=a~dy$, as in the good answer.

  • $\begingroup$ That is not necessary. I just struggle with the initially with Part A of Qmechanic answer since it goes beyond my current knowledge. I don't know what a diffeomorphism is and what it means for something to transform covariantly. Nor have i ever heard of half densities. I need some time to familiarize myself with that. I am a chemist and my mathematical background is bad. My exposition to QM formalism was very superficial. Mostly manipulating symbols without understanding whats going on, to be honest. $\endgroup$
    – Hans Wurst
    Nov 29 '20 at 14:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.