1
$\begingroup$

I've read that the cause of Nuclear fission and nuclear fusion lies in the fact that Nuclear Binding Energy confers stability to a nucleus. This is why too heavy or too light nuclei resort to these processes to attain stability, and become nuclei with intermediate atomic weight. Two questions come to my mind here

  1. is it an experimental observation that nuclei with intermediate atomic mass are stable, or is there a reason to it? I can understand that too many protons in the nucleus would lead to instability. But what harm can too many neutrons cause?

  2. I've always known that everything in nature tries to lose energy to attain stability. That's why bonds are formed in the first place. But why is it that more binding energy per nucleon makes a nucleus more stable?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

If you have a collection of nucleons together and they will attempt to minimise their energy density. They will do this by maximising their binding energy per nucleon. For matter at low density this corresponds to nuclei around the "iron-peak" (iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese). This is just a trade-off between the strong nuclear attraction felt by all nucleons and the Coulomb repulsion felt by the protons.

This will only happen if the nuclei are in conditions where equilibration is possible - i.e. where reaction rates are fast enough. For example it happens in the centre of a star prior to a supernova, or in the crust of a neutron star.

Simply adding more and more neutrons doesn't work. Neutrons are indistinguishable fermions and must reside in different quantum states. When increasingly higher energy levels are filled by neutrons they are then unstable to beta decay into a proton and electron.

More neutron-rich nuclei can exist in high density electron-degenerate conditions, such as the crusts of neutron stars, where the electron degeneracy can block beta decay.

More binding energy per nucleon is more stable because binding energy is negative.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is it relevant to answer the question "But what harm can too many neutrons cause?" I wonder why a high density seems to allow the presence of very neutron rich isotopes in the outer crust of neutron stars, e.g. Ni-66 and Kr-118, as mentioned in Table 2 of www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5255077/ $\endgroup$ – gamma1954 Nov 23 '20 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Rob Jeffries How does electron degeneracy block beta decay? $\endgroup$ – Boingboingboing Nov 24 '20 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ @ZMeson by occupying all electron energy states up to the maximum that can be produced in the decay. This is why neutron stars are mostly neutrons. physics.stackexchange.com/questions/341733/… $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Nov 24 '20 at 8:05
  • $\begingroup$ In astrophysics, Rob Jeffries' answers are very valuable to me. Clear, to-the-point, quick and in such terms that even my simple mind can understand. I refuse to apologise for this compliment, which is probably illegal in a comment. $\endgroup$ – gamma1954 Nov 24 '20 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ @RobJeffries Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ – Boingboingboing Nov 25 '20 at 10:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.