0
$\begingroup$

I recently attempted to answer this question, to which I felt qualified because the possibility of Tachyons had been discussed when I took a course on Special Relativity. In that same course I learned the formula $\lambda' = \lambda \sqrt{\frac{1+\beta}{1-\beta}}$ to describe relativistic red- and blueshift.

In order to provide more clarity I found an image on the internet which is added to the bottom of this post. In that image it was shown that light the light of the particle would be blueshifted as it approached the observer and redshifted as it moves away - just as regular particles with $\beta < 1$ would behave. But I did consider it my responsibility to check whether the information I was providing in my answer was wholly correct, and so I tried to compute the redshift for $\beta = 2$ and $\lambda = 400$ nm.

Which gave $$\lambda' = 400 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1+2}{1-2}} = 400\sqrt{-3} \approx 693i$$ which I had no clue how to interpret.

For now I added a note to my answer to admit that I am not sure in what way the light would be blue or redshifted - although I am certain that it would still arive in some form or another since $c = 1$ is not changed.

My question then is, do any of Einstein's theories provide a way to interpret this imaginary-shifting of light, or is this, like the fact that their mass is expected to be infinite just another argument that the Tachyon's existence is unlikely?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The issue with tachyon is that causality is not preserved. So the end of the wavelength can happen before the start of it as opposed to subluminal observer. I think this is the root of the problem. I'll try to write whole answer once I find enough time. $\endgroup$
    – Umaxo
    Nov 19 '20 at 10:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.