1
$\begingroup$
  1. One has that $ds^{2} = g_{ij}(x)dx^{i}dx^{j}$. I often see that the interval is re-expressed with a time "seperation" of the form: $$ ds^{2} = g_{00}(x)dt^{2} + \tilde{g}_{ab}dx^{a}dx^{b} \;\; a,b = 1,2,3 $$ When can this be done?

  2. Why can the proper time infinitesimal always be written in the form (according to Wiki "Proper time"): $ d\tau = \sqrt{g_{00}(x)}dt \; ? $

Thank you in advance for your answers

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ For the first one, it's when the 'cross terms' $g_{0a}$ (and correspondingly, $g_{a0}$) are zero $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 10:47
  • $\begingroup$ Can you always find coordinates such that these cross terms are zero? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 10:50
  • $\begingroup$ Does this help? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, thank you. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 12:18

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

1)

I believe this can be done always, but I am not sure. You need to get rid of the cross terms $g_{0a}$ and you have 4 coordinate transformations at your disposal to get rid of the 3 metric functions, while keeping $g_{00}$ positive (assuming the signature is (+,-,-,-)). This looks like a problem that has a solution.

2)

It cannot. The proper time is always attached to some worldline. For any worldline whatsoever, the general formula is: $$d\tau=c^{-1}ds=c^{-1}\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu}$$ This reduces to your formula only along worldlines that keep $x^1$,$x^2$ and $x^3$ constant.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ For (1), what about a non-static spacetime, e.g. the Kerr spacetime? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ @NiharKarve interesting question. The thing is, in Kerr spacetime it is the timelike killing vector that is not hypersurface orthogonal. But we are not assuming $t$ being given by this vector. $\endgroup$
    – Umaxo
    Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 11:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Umaxo Thanks! Sorry to ask again but if you look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_time#In_general_relativity under general relativity they say that "In the same way that coordinates can be chosen such that x1, x2, x3 = const in special relativity, this can be done in general relativity too." Is this not always the case? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ @ThomasHasler I see. You can find such coordinates for any worldline P along which you integrate, that is true. I just assumed you look for global coordinates in which the formula is true for any worldline. $\endgroup$
    – Umaxo
    Commented Nov 18, 2020 at 12:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.