I'm trying to find the solution to the 2D stationary diffusion equation


where $\vec{\rho}=(x,y)$ and $D$ is the diffusion coefficient.

Help would be very much appreciated. Also, I'd be happy to get some references as well.

Thanks in advance.


I assume that your sign is correct: that there is a sink rather than a source at ${\bf r}_2$?

Then this is standard result from electrostatics --- the potential of a line charge: $$ P({\bf r}_1, {\bf r}_2)= \frac 1{2\pi D} \ln (\mu|{\bf r}_1- {\bf r}_2|), $$ where $\mu$ is a constant that it is not determined by your equation. You need to specify the radius $\mu^{-1}$ at which $P$ becomes zero. This has to be bigger than zero for a solution to exist.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi Mike, and thanks for the answer. Is this the 2D solution? Does $\vec{r}$ have a $z$ component as well? $\endgroup$ – FlyGuy Nov 16 '20 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ I was intending ${\bf r}$ to be two dimensional. In three D with a line sink on the $z$ axis, $|r_1-r_2|$ should be the radial distance from the sink, ie the $r$ in cylindrical polar coordinates. $\endgroup$ – mike stone Nov 16 '20 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ I just noticed that I messed up the sign. Clearly there should be a negative sign before the diffusion coefficient. Is this the solution to the corrected equation (with the negative sign before D)? $\endgroup$ – FlyGuy Nov 16 '20 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ Feels like this solution still holds if, say, I define $W=-P$. $\endgroup$ – FlyGuy Nov 16 '20 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. That's why I asked if there was a sink rather than a source at the origin. Just change the sign of $P$ and you are OK. $\endgroup$ – mike stone Nov 16 '20 at 16:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.