5
$\begingroup$

This question is inspired by another one about the simplest model of topological insulator, where 4tnemele showed a nice two band model in the answer.

I read that and am wondering if we and push that to one dimension.

For example, by analogy to the graphene case, if we have a Hamiltonian in 1D (say x) as $H(k_x)=(k_x-k_0)+m$ for $k_x>0$. When $k_x=k_0$, one has $m>0$. $H(k_x)=(k_x+k_0)+m$ for $k_x<0$. When $k_x=-k_0$, one has $m<0$. A smooth connection in between, we will have a conductive edge (two ends in the 1D structure), right?

If I want to make a intuitive picture like below, is it correct? enter image description here

Any suggestion for real materials show this behavior?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I can't say anything too insightful as an answer to your actual question, but I think it's interesting to note that novel "edge modes" on the free ends of 1D systems are actually quite generic, two beautiful examples being emergent spin-1/2 excitations at the tips of S=1 Heisenberg magnets (see also the AKLT chain) or Majorana fermion modes on the ends of the Kitaev chain. $\endgroup$ – wsc Feb 26 '11 at 4:01
11
$\begingroup$

Topological insulators are gapped states of free fermions with particle number conservation and time-reversal symmetry. According to the K-theory classification, there is no Topological insulator in 1D.

However, 1D interacting fermions with time-reversal symmetry do have non-trivial symmetry protected topological phases if the particle number is conserved only mod n. The result can be obtained from group cohomology theory arXiv:1106.4772 of Chen, Gu, Liu, and Wen.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Xiao-Gang Wen, if you cite yourself, it would be good if you could say so explicitly in your answers, not just in the links, cf. Physics.SE policy and SE policy. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic May 30 '12 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Hey Prof. Wen, how to understand the particle number conservation in topological insulators. Normally people only say it is time-reversal invariant. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Timothy Oct 16 '12 at 13:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic I thought "Chen, Gu, Liu, and Wen" explicitly contains my name Wen. Jeremy: Yes, normally people only say it is time-reversal invariant. But "insulator" implies particle number conservation. $\endgroup$ – Xiao-Gang Wen Oct 18 '12 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ Dear @Xiao-Gang Wen: What is meant is, that it would be best, if you could refer to yourself using a 1st person pronoun. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Oct 18 '12 at 5:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Jeremy (sorry for commenting on such an old question). The reason why people don't mention particle conservation is that they are using the standard complex Hamiltonians of the form $H = \sum_{ij}H_{ij}a^\dagger_ia_j$ which explicitly conserves particle number. Except if the Hamiltonian has particle-hole symmetry, which means it describes a superconductor in the mean-field approximation (using Nambu spinors). (Continued) $\endgroup$ – Heidar Dec 8 '12 at 17:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.