0
$\begingroup$

In "The electrodynamics of moving dielectrics" (p. 262) Landau and Lifshitz have defined four-tensors and four-vector

$F^{\mu \nu} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-E_x&-E_y&-E_z\\ E_x&0&-B_z&B_y\\ E_y&B_z&0&-B_x\\ E_z&-B_y&B_x&0\\ \end{pmatrix}$

$H^{\mu \nu} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-D_x&-D_y&-D_z\\ D_x&0&-H_z&H_y\\ D_y&H_z&0&-H_x\\ D_z&-H_y&H_x&0\\ \end{pmatrix}$

$u^{\mu} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}},&\frac{\vec{v}}{c\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \end{pmatrix}$

Then they write

From this four-vector and the four-tensors $F^{\mu \nu}$ and $H^{\mu \nu}$ we form combinations which become $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{D}$ in a medium at rest. These combinations are the four-vectors $F^{\lambda \mu}u_{\mu}$ and $H^{\lambda \mu}u_{\mu}$; for $\vec{v} = 0$ their time components are zero and their space components are $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{D}$ respectively. The four-dimensional generalization of the equation $\vec{D} = \epsilon \vec{E}$ is therefore evidently $$ H^{\lambda \mu} u_{\mu} = \epsilon F^{\lambda \mu}u_{\mu} $$

How is that evident?

I understand that with the assumption $\vec{v} = 0$ that generalized equation gives us $\vec{D} = \epsilon \vec{E}$. But couldn't that just be a lucky coincidence?

Or is the reasoning something along these lines: "We found this equation, it gives good results, all the experiments work with that too, so it's probably right." ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

We know that $\vec{D}=\epsilon\vec{E}$ in a medium at rest, assuming Einstein's principle of relativity to hold not only for Newtonian mechanics but for Maxwell's electrodynamics as well. Landau and Lifshitz manage to express this in a manifestly covariant way (as one says) as $H^{\lambda\mu}u_\mu=\epsilon F^{\lambda\mu}u_\mu$. Equations of the same form will then automatically be valid in all other inertial frames, since both sides of the equation transform as contravariant four-vectors under the Lorentz group.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.