3
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

I came across this in the lecture notes of quantum field theory by David Tong. Inside time ordering interactions aren’t taken to be normal ordered. Interaction hamiltonian should be normal ordered otherwise it is not well defined (due to ordering ambiguity and related singularities). Most standard QFT textbooks don’t address this issue. Am i missing something here or normal ordering was assumed?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/133426/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/10804/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic ♦
    Commented Nov 1, 2020 at 22:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This doesn’t answer my question. My question is whether we use normal ordered hamiltonian in s matrix or not and why books don’t take normal ordered hamiltonian? I am confused about this point. $\endgroup$
    – Roy
    Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 2:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Schwarz’s and peskin’s book don’t mention this issue. So am i right or wrong? $\endgroup$
    – Roy
    Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 2:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also Joe Polchinski in his string theory book says normal ordering is of little use in most interacting field theories , because these have additional divergences from interaction vertices approaching the composite operator or one another. Again i am confused because without normal ordering these composite operators aren’t well defined. $\endgroup$
    – Roy
    Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 2:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ normal ordering can be undone by an appropriate choice of counterterms. since normal ordering does not remove all divergences in interacting field theories one needs further counterterms. so one can instead work with a different set of counterterms from the outset, one that removes all divergences from the outset with no reference to normal ordering. there is a normal ordering that is useful also in interacting theories (google: complete normal ordering), which serves to ensure you land on the quantum corrected vacuum, but here too there are further divergences and more counterterms are needed $\endgroup$
    – Wakabaloola
    Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 5:34

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

Here there should be normal ordering for individual interaction terms inside time ordering.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. The fact that they are normal ordered is manifested by the fact that you remove vacuum bubbles when computing the diagrams. $\endgroup$
    – Connor Behan
    Commented Oct 20, 2021 at 20:24
0
$\begingroup$

Most standard QFT textbooks don’t address this issue. Am i missing something here or normal ordering was assumed?

What? No. What could you possibly mean by "most standard QFT textbooks..."?

Check out the section titled "Wick's Theorem" in Peskin and Schroeder's textbook titled: "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" (first edition, copyright 1995).

In the first edition of the above-mentioned textbook, Wick's Theorem is discussed in section 4.3 on page 88.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.