3
$\begingroup$

In Weinberg's Gravitation and Cosmology, the author mentions that an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation (in the four-vector representation of the Lorentz group) has the form $$\Lambda^{\alpha}_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta}=\delta^{\alpha}_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta}+\omega^{\alpha}_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta}.\tag{$\dagger$}$$ It is then straightforward to verify that the $\omega$-matrix must satisfy $$\omega_{\gamma\delta}=-\omega_{\delta\gamma}.\tag{$*$}$$ I'm okay with that. Then, Weinberg says that the matrix representation $D(\Lambda)$ of such a transformation (now a general, say $n\times n$ representation) must satisfy $$D(1+\omega)=1+\frac{1}{2}\omega^{\alpha\beta}\sigma_{\alpha\beta}\tag{$**$}$$ where $\sigma_{\alpha\beta}$ are a set of matrices which may be chosen to be antisymmetric, by virtue of (*).

I have no idea where the exact form ( ** ) comes from. What's a little confusing to me is that in (†), I believe that $\omega$ may be any any linear combination of the generators of the four-vector representation of the Lorentz group and $\omega^\alpha_{\phantom{\alpha}\beta}$ are its matrix elements, while in (**) $\omega$ seems to be a set of infinitesimal parameters, whilst $\sigma_{\alpha\beta}$ are now the generators (I think I know the $1/2$ prevents counting each generator twice).

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

This is what's happening: you have $\vartheta^{\gamma\delta}$ parameters for describing the $\text{SO}^+(1,3)$ group; they constitute an antisimmetric matrix in their $\gamma,\delta$ indexes, so that the actual free parameters are the usual $6$ for the proper Lorentz transformation.

That said consider that an infinitesimal proper Lorentz transformation will be $$ {\Lambda^\alpha}_\beta \approx {\mathbb{I}^\alpha}_\beta + \frac{1}{2} \vartheta_{\gamma\delta} {\mathbb{J}^{\gamma\delta\alpha}}_\beta $$ where you got ${\left(\mathbb{J}^{\gamma\delta}\right)^\alpha}_\beta=-{\left(\mathbb{J}^{\delta\gamma}\right)^\alpha}_\beta,\,\forall\,\alpha,\beta$, so that you can think it as an antisymmetric (but just on $\gamma,\delta$ indices) matrix of matrices \begin{gather*} \begin{pmatrix} {\left(\mathbb{J}^{\gamma\delta}\right)^\alpha}_\beta \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \mathbb{O}&\mathbb{J}^{01}&\mathbb{J}^{02}&\mathbb{J}^{03} \\ -\mathbb{J}^{01}&\mathbb{O}&\mathbb{J}^{12}&\mathbb{J}^{13} \\ -\mathbb{J}^{02}&-\mathbb{J}^{12}&\mathbb{O}&\mathbb{J}^{23} \\ -\mathbb{J}^{03}&-\mathbb{J}^{13}&-\mathbb{J}^{23}&\mathbb{O} \end{pmatrix} \\ \mathbb{J}^{01} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}, \, \mathbb{J}^{02} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&1&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}, \, \mathbb{J}^{03} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0&1 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 1&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix} \\ \mathbb{J}^{12} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&-1&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}, \, \mathbb{J}^{13} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&-1 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \end{pmatrix}, \, \mathbb{J}^{23} = \begin{pmatrix} 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&0&-1 \\ 0&0&1&0 \end{pmatrix} \end{gather*} P.S. $$ \mathbb{G}^{\alpha\gamma} {\mathbb{I}^\delta}_\beta - \mathbb{G}^{\alpha\delta} {\mathbb{I}^\gamma}_\beta \doteq {\mathbb{J}^{\gamma\delta\alpha}}_\beta $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I am impressed by the amount of effort it must have taken to type all this out. $\endgroup$
    – RC_23
    Aug 1, 2022 at 23:31
  • $\begingroup$ @RC_23 Not so much actually, I adapted my own notes ahah $\endgroup$
    – Rob Tan
    Aug 2, 2022 at 8:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.