I am working with some field theory and I am at a point where I would like to change my sign convention from $(-,+,+,+)$ to $(+,-,-,-)$. I am worried at some point I will just equations with the wrong sign because I am used to it and just going by memory.

Is there any table with the differences in sign for the "standard" equation (for example Lagrangians, energy-momentum tensor, equation of motion etc?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I recommend learning how to figure out which convention an equation is using. For example, a Lagrangian has a positive “kinetic” term. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Oct 27, 2020 at 19:05

2 Answers 2


TL;DR: The main rule is that kinetic terms should be positive, cf. above comment by G. Smith.


  • The Lagrangian density for a scalar field is $${\cal L}~=~\mp \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi -{\cal V}(\phi), $$ with Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation $$ \pm\Box\phi~=~{\cal V}^{\prime}(\phi),$$ if the signature of the Minkowski metric is $(\mp,\pm,\pm,\pm)$, respectively.

    The sign convention for the stress-energy-momentum (SEM) tensor is $$\begin{align} T^{\mu\nu}~=~&\mp \frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\partial^{\nu}\phi \pm g^{\mu\nu}{\cal L} ~=~\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial^{\nu}\phi \pm g^{\mu\nu}{\cal L}, \cr T_{\mu\nu}~=~&\mp \frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial (\partial^{\mu}\phi)}\partial_{\nu}\phi \pm g_{\mu\nu}{\cal L} ~=~\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi \pm g_{\mu\nu}{\cal L}, \end{align}$$ cf. this related Phys.SE post.


Check Appendix E of Burgess & Moore's The Standard Model: A Primer. There is a pretty good collection of results like that there.

PS. Sorry to lose another soldier to the dark side that is the $(+---)$ metric (just kidding)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.