Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I am working with some field theory and I am at a point where I would like to change my sign convention from $(-,+,+,+)$ to $(+,-,-,-)$. I am worried at some point I will just equations with the wrong sign because I am used to it and just going by memory.
Is there any table with the differences in sign for the "standard" equation (for example Lagrangians, energy-momentum tensor, equation of motion etc?
TL;DR: The main rule is that kinetic terms should be positive, cf. above comment by G. Smith.
Example:
The Lagrangian density for a scalar field is $${\cal L}~=~\mp \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi -{\cal V}(\phi), $$ with Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation $$ \pm\Box\phi~=~{\cal V}^{\prime}(\phi),$$ if the signature of the Minkowski metric is $(\mp,\pm,\pm,\pm)$, respectively.
The sign convention for the stress-energy-momentum (SEM) tensor is $$\begin{align} T^{\mu\nu}~=~&\mp \frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\partial^{\nu}\phi \pm g^{\mu\nu}{\cal L} ~=~\partial^{\mu}\phi\partial^{\nu}\phi \pm g^{\mu\nu}{\cal L}, \cr T_{\mu\nu}~=~&\mp \frac{\partial{\cal L}}{\partial (\partial^{\mu}\phi)}\partial_{\nu}\phi \pm g_{\mu\nu}{\cal L} ~=~\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi \pm g_{\mu\nu}{\cal L}, \end{align}$$ cf. this related Phys.SE post.
Check Appendix E of Burgess & Moore's The Standard Model: A Primer. There is a pretty good collection of results like that there.
PS. Sorry to lose another soldier to the dark side that is the $(+---)$ metric (just kidding)
